Kashf al-Asrar an al-Qawl al-Talid fima Lahiqa Masalat al-Hijab min Tahrif wa Tabdil wa Tashif
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- None
Kashf al-Asrar ‘an al-Qawl al-Talid fima Lahiqa Mas’alat al-Hijab min Tahrif wa Tabdil wa Tashif (Arabic: كشف الأسرار عن القول التليد فيما لحق مسألة الحجاب من تحريف وتبديل وتصحيف; Unveiling the Secrets of the Ancient View Concerning the Distortions, Alterations, and Misinterpretations Befallen the Issue of Hijab) is a contemporary legal and exegetical treatise by Turki ibn Umar ibn Muhammad Belahmar . The book presents a detailed textual and jurisprudential study on the origins of the obligation of the Islamic veil, arguing that covering the face (niqab) is an obligatory duty for Muslim women in front of non-mahram men according to the consensus of early scholars, and refuting the view that considers face-covering merely recommended or sunnah .
Background and Purpose
The author completed the work on Thursday, 15 Jumada al-Akhirah 1429 AH (2008 CE) . In the introduction, Belahmar explains that he was prompted to write the treatise in response to widespread contemporary claims that the Companions of the Prophet ﷺ held differing opinions regarding whether covering the face was obligatory or optional . He contends that such disagreements could not have occurred during the early era given the public nature of the practice and the presence of women around the Prophet ﷺ . Instead, he maintains that dispute over the issue is an unprecedented development arising after the consensus of the first three generations of Islam, resulting from modern misconceptions, out-of-context readings, and misinterpretations of classical scholarly positions .
Content and Structure
The book is arranged into analytical sections addressing the Quranic chronology of hijab legislation, exegetical reports, and responses to contemporary positions:
- Chronology of Revelation and Surah al-Ahzab: The author argues that many contemporary proponents of uncovering the face err by taking Surah al-Nur (verse 31) as the baseline for hijab legislation . Relying on reports from Anas ibn Malik, he demonstrates that the verses in Surah al-Ahzab (verses 53 and 59) were revealed first, establishing the comprehensive obligation to cover the body and face through the jilbab as transmitted by Ibn Abbas and early commentators without recorded disagreement .
- Analysis of Surah al-Nur: The book examines Surah al-Nur as a subsequent revelation providing further elaborations and specific dispensations rather than introducing the foundational rule of hijab . Belahmar interprets the phrase وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا ("and not to reveal their adornment except what is apparent thereof") as an exception for unavoidable or necessary exposure following the strict baseline enacted in al-Ahzab .
- Rulings Regarding the Mothers of the Believers: A dedicated chapter discusses the specific status (khususiyyah) granted to the wives of the Prophet ﷺ, clarifying that their distinction lay in the strict requirement not to be seen at all even from behind clothes, rather than meaning that the obligation of covering the face was unique to them .
- Critique of Contemporary Counterarguments: The book evaluates evidence frequently cited by modern authors who permit uncovering the face, concluding that such arguments rely on weak narrations, speculative interpretations, or general lexical readings disconnected from classical consensus .
Scholarly Engagement
Throughout the text, Belahmar engages in detail with contemporary works advocating the permissibility of uncovering the face, notably addressing arguments made by Muhammad Nasir al-Din al-Albani . In the conclusion, the author emphasizes that his critique addresses modern juristic opinions and interpretations while recognizing that modern scholars who held such views did so with sincere intentions seeking adherence to Islamic sources .
Answer updated