Ikhtilaf Aqwal al-Nuqqad fi al-Ruwat al-Mukhtalaf fihim ma Dirasat hadhihi al-Zahirah ind Ibn Main
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- King Fahd Complex for the Printing of the Holy Quran
Ikhtilaf Aqwal al-Nuqqad fi al-Ruwat al-Mukhtalaf fihim ma Dirasat hadhihi al-Zahirah ind Ibn Main (Divergence in Critics' Statements Regarding Disputed Narrators with a Case Study of This Phenomenon in Ibn Ma'in) is a specialized hadith study by Sadi bin Mahdi al-Hashimi examining the conflicting evaluations of narrators in the science of hadith criticism (al-jarh wa-l-ta'dil), with a focus on the rulings of Yahya ibn Ma'in .
Background and Purpose
The work addresses the phenomenon wherein prolific early hadith critics issued multiple, seemingly contradictory judgments of appraisal (ta'dil) and disparagement (jarh) regarding the same narrator . Al-Hashimi notes that scholars of hadith terminology and legal theory addressed this under the rubric of "reconciling conflicting appraisal and criticism" (ta'arud al-jarh wa-l-ta'dil), as a critic's assessment directly impacts the authenticity of hadiths . He cites al-Tirmidhi and Ibn Taymiyyah to highlight that scholarly disagreement over narrator reliability is analogous to jurisprudential disagreement over legal rulings . Because Ibn Ma'in evaluated virtually all narrators across numerous sessions recorded by many transmitters, his varying statements represent a prime manifestation of this phenomenon, prompting al-Hashimi to deduce systematic principles for harmonizing such reports .
Structure and Contents
The study comprises an introduction and six main chapters (mabahith) :
- Chapter 1: Earlier Literature on Disputed Narrators: Reviews classical works dedicated to disputed transmitters, noting the earliest extant treatise by Ibn Shahin, Ibn Hibban's planned work al-Fasl bayna al-Naqalah (or al-Fadl min al-Naqalah), and al-Mundhiri's appendix on disputed narrators at the conclusion of al-Targhib wa-l-Tarhib .
- Chapter 2: Differing Statements from Individual Critics: Provides examples of single critics altering their verdicts on a narrator—such as Ahmad ibn Hanbal's varying descriptions of Ismail ibn Zakariyya al-Khulqani—due to new exposure to a narrator's transmissions, changing circumstances in memory, or reliance on earlier critics .
- Chapter 3: Sample Study of a Disputed Narrator: Analyzes a case where multiple classical authorities differed in their overall judgment .
- Chapter 4: Ibn Ma'in's Critical Method and Muhammad ibn Ishaq: Introduces Ibn Ma'in and examines his diverse statements regarding the early historian Muhammad ibn Ishaq . Al-Hashimi classifies Ibn Ma'in's reports into explicit endorsements, critical weakenings, intermediate evaluations, and relative appraisals transmitted by students such as Abbas al-Duri, Ibn Abi Khaythamah, and al-Ghallabi .
- Chapter 5: Stances of Hadith Masters Regarding Ibn Ma'in's Discrepancies: Details how later memorizers of hadith understood and explained the apparent conflicts in Ibn Ma'in's vocabulary and statements .
- Chapter 6: Methodological Steps for Reconciliation: Sets forth practical guidelines for harmonizing conflicting rulings from Ibn Ma'in, beginning with verifying the authenticity of attribution to him, contextualizing his terminology, and examining relative comparisons between narrators .
Publication
The research was published as part of the proceedings of the symposium on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's patronage of the prophetic Sunnah and biography (Inayat al-Mamlakah bi-l-Sunnah wa-l-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah), hosted by the King Fahd Glorious Quran Printing Complex in Medina in 1425 AH (2004 CE) .
Answer updated