Bayan Haqiqat al-Tawhid alladhi jaat bihi al-rusul wa dadh al-shubuhat allati uthirat hawlahu

Author died
-
Editions
al-Jāmi‘ah al-Islāmīyah

Bayan Haqiqat al-Tawhid alladhi jaat bihi al-rusul wa dadh al-shubuhat allati uthirat hawlahu (Clarification of the Reality of Monotheism Brought by the Messengers and Refutation of Doubts Raised Around It) is a treatise on Islamic creed by the Saudi Hanbali jurist and scholar Salih al-Fawzan . The work defines the concept of monotheism (tawhid) as taught by the prophets and provides a systematic refutation of twelve major theological doubts and misconceptions raised to justify polytheistic practices .

Purpose and Content

The author opens the treatise by emphasizing that sound creed ('aqidah) forms the essential foundation of any community and was the primary mission of all divine messengers . Tracing the historical origin of polytheism (shirk), al-Fawzan notes that deviation first occurred among the people of Noah through excessive veneration (ghuluww) of deceased righteous figures and the gradual adoption of statues and images across generations .

The book outlines the division of monotheism into tawhid al-rububiyyah (the affirmation of God's lordship, creation, and provision) and tawhid al-uluhiyyah or tawhid al-'ibadah (singling out God alone in all acts of worship) . Al-Fawzan explains that pre-Islamic polytheists affirmed God's lordship, and that true monotheism demands dedicating worship exclusively to Him, which constitutes the essential meaning of the testimony of faith (La ilaha illa Allah) . He also distinguishes between major shirk (which expels a person from the religion, such as supplicating or offering sacrifices to the dead) and minor shirk (such as swearing by other than God or minor ostentation) .

Refutation of Doubts

The core of the book addresses twelve specific arguments and misconceptions used to defend grave veneration and illicit mediation:

  1. Appeal to ancestral custom: Blindly following the practices and traditions of forefathers without textual guidance .
  2. Justification by divine decree: Claiming that polytheism occurs by God's will and is therefore pleasing to Him .
  3. Mere verbal pronouncement: The belief that reciting the testimony of faith guarantees salvation regardless of committing acts of major polytheism .
  4. Denial of polytheism in the Muslim community: The claim that polytheism is impossible among professed Muslims, which al-Fawzan refutes using prophetic warnings regarding following the errors of past nations .
  5. Misinterpreting Satan's despair: Citing the hadith of Satan despairing of being worshipped in the Arabian Peninsula to claim immunity from shirk .
  6. Direct requests for intercession: Supplicating deceased righteous figures for intercession (shafa'ah) rather than asking God alone, while clarifying the conditions for valid intercession (God's permission and His pleasure with the person interceded for) .
  7. Exaggerating the status of saints: Arguing that love for saints (awliya') permits seeking blessings from their physical relics or supplicating God through their spiritual status .
  8. Misconstruing the concept of wasilah: Interpreting Quranic references to seeking a means of approach (al-wasilah) as creating intermediaries, rather than performing righteous deeds . The author categorizes legitimate tawassul (by God's names and attributes, showing poverty to Him, one's own righteous actions, or asking a living righteous person for supplication) versus forbidden forms (supplicating via the essence or sanctity of beings, or invoking the dead) .
  9. Misapplied and fabricated narrations: Relying on misunderstood reports—such as the narration of the blind man who asked the Prophet for supplication during his lifetime—or fabricated traditions regarding supplicating through the Prophet's status .
  10. Reliance on dreams and anecdotes: Basing theological rulings and ritual practices on personal dreams and unverified stories, such as the account attributed to al-'Utbi at the Prophet's grave .
  11. Apparent fulfillment of worldly needs: Claiming that the occurrence of answered requests at shrines justifies calling upon those buried there, which al-Fawzan explains as divine trial (istidraj) or coincidence with preordained decree .
  12. Redefining polytheism as worldly attachment: The assertion by certain Sufi groups that shirk consists only of love for the material world, which the author criticizes as an attempt to obscure major polytheistic practices at tombs .

The treatise concludes with a summary of the severe scriptural warnings regarding polytheism, highlighting that it represents the gravest injustice, invalidates good deeds, and bars an unrepentant practitioner from divine forgiveness and Paradise .

Answer updated