al-Turuk al-Nabawiya - Taseelan wa Tatbiqan

Author died
-
Editions
Ministry of Awqaf and Islamic Affairs in the State of Qatar

al-Turuk al-Nabawiya - Taseelan wa Tatbiqan (Prophetic Non-Actions: Foundational Principles and Applied Cases) is a contemporary study in Islamic jurisprudence and legal theory (usul al-fiqh) by Muhammad Salah al-Itrabi, devoted to the legislative authority and legal implications of the Prophet Muhammad's ﷺ intentional non-actions or omissions (al-tark) .

Composition and Publication

The work originated as a master's thesis submitted to the Department of Islamic Sharia at the Faculty of Dar al-Ulum, Cairo University, under the title Turuk al-Nabi ﷺ: Dirasa Ta'siliyya wa Tatbiqiyya (The Non-Actions of the Prophet ﷺ: A Foundational and Applied Study), which was defended in late 2009 CE . When adapted for publication, the author introduced minor revisions and additional material . The author dedicated the book in Rajab 1433 AH / June 2012 CE to his teacher Abu Ishaq al-Huwayni . It was published in its first edition in 1433 AH / 2012 CE by the Department of Islamic Affairs at the Ministry of Awqaf and Islamic Affairs of Qatar .

Purpose and Scope

The book addresses the concept that the Sunnah comprises both positive acts (sayings and deeds) and negative acts (deliberate omissions), arguing that the Prophet's ﷺ intentional avoidance of an act carries legislative significance . The author explores how al-tark impacts foundational usuli topics, including unrestricted public interests (al-maslaha al-mursala), religious innovation (al-bid'a), prophetic emulation (al-ta'assi), the default legal status of things (al-asl fi al-ashya'), legal accountability (al-taklif), the higher objectives of Islamic law (al-maqasid), and rulings on contemporary legal novelties (al-nawazil) .

Structure and Method

The book is arranged into an introduction and three main parts (abwab):

  • Part One: Examines the linguistic definition of tark and its conceptual reality among legal theorists, addressing whether non-action constitutes an action (fi'l) and the resulting theoretical and practical legal differences . It reviews classical and contemporary definitions of Prophetic non-action, establishes the author's preferred definition, outlines methods for identifying Prophetic omissions, and divides tark into positive omission (tark wujudi) and negative omission (tark 'adami) .
  • Part Two: Focuses on positive omission (al-tark al-wujudi) and its adjuncts, detailing its definition, divisions, textual examples, applied legal questions, and usuli implications .
  • Part Three: Treats negative omission (al-tark al-'adami), containing a chapter on its definition, subcategories, and legal indications, a chapter on its applied jurisprudence, and a concluding chapter on related matters, particularly the Prophet's ﷺ omission of detailed inquiry (tark al-istifsal) .

The author relies on authentic hadith narrations, grading reported texts and citing classical legal manuals, and provides detailed indexes and cross-references .

Reception

The published edition includes prefatory endorsements from several contemporary scholars, including Abd al-Hamid Abu Zunayd, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Maqsud al-Afifi, Ahmad ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Naqib, Yasir Husayn Burhami, and Ashraf ibn Mahmud al-Kinani . Abu Zunayd commended the book's extensive coverage of applied cases and literature review, though he noted that the inclusion of non-actions by ordinary legal subjects in the first part fell outside the core subject of Prophetic legislation, suggesting it would have been more fitting to focus instead on incidents during the Prophetic era about which revelation remained silent . Al-Naqib highlighted the author's systematic structure and his application of legal principles when evaluating specific disputed issues, such as the permissibility of constructing minarets on mosques and the question of expiation regarding marital relations during daytime fasting in Ramadan .

Answer updated