al-Ilam bima fi Din al-Nasara min al-Fasad wa al-Awham
- Author died
- 671 AH
- Editions
- Dar al-Turath al-Arabi
Al-Iʿlām bi-mā fī Dīn al-Naṣārā min al-Fasād wa-l-Awhām (Informing of the Corruption and Delusions in the Religion of the Christians) is an Andalusian polemical and theological work written to refute Christian doctrine, defend Islamic tenets, and establish the proofs of the prophethood of Muḥammad ﷺ .
Context and Authorship
The book was written in response to a polemical treatise titled Tathlīth al-waḥdāniyya fī maʿrifat Allāh (The Trinity of Unity in the Knowledge of God), which was sent by a Christian writer from Toledo to Cordoba . In that text, the author attacked Islam, disparaged its beliefs, and threatened to disseminate criticisms of Islamic law across Muslim cities, prompting the Andalusian scholar to compose a comprehensive refutation .
The work has traditionally been attributed to the Quranic exegete Abū ʿAbd Allāh al-Qurtubi (d. 671 AH / 1273 CE) . However, several modern researchers attribute it instead to the Hadith scholar Abū al-ʿAbbās al-Qurṭubī (d. 656 AH / 1258 CE), author of al-Mufhim, who repeatedly cited the work in al-Mufhim under abbreviated variants of its title as well as its full title .
Structure and Contents
The author arranged the book into an introductory section (ṣadr) followed by four major thematic parts (abwāb) :
- Introduction (Ṣadr al-Kitāb): Examines the preamble of the opponent's treatise and dissects its title, arguing that combining "trinity" with "unity" is a contradiction in terms, as unity denotes the negation of multiplicity while trinity affirms it .
- First Part (al-Bāb al-Awwal): Discusses the Christian doctrine of the Trinity and the divine hypostases (al-aqānīm), analyzing their theological formulations and the differences among various denominations .
- Second Part (al-Bāb al-Thānī): Critiques the concepts of union (ittiḥād) and indwelling (ḥulūl) regarding the divine and human natures of Jesus, addressing the stances of groups such as the Melkites, Jacobites, and Nestorians .
- Third Part (al-Bāb al-Thālith): Covers prophethood in general and substantiates the prophethood of Muḥammad ﷺ using four main categories of proof: biblical prophecies and descriptions given by earlier prophets, examination of his character and conduct, the Quran, and his sensory miracles (khawāriq al-ʿādāt) .
- Fourth Part (al-Bāb al-Rābiʿ): Divided into two subsections (fannān); the first critiques Christian rites, canon laws, and practices as lacking scriptural authority from the Torah or Gospels, while the second answers Christian objections against Islamic law and demonstrates the wisdom of Islamic legal rulings .
Method and Sources
The author relies on both rational deduction (al-maʿqūl) and textual evidence (al-manqūl) . Rather than drawing exclusively on second-hand summaries of Christian doctrine by earlier Muslim theologians, he quotes Christian texts and theological definitions directly in their own phrasing . In defending Islamic legal rulings, he maintains that revealed law may bring matters that human reason cannot independently discover, but it does not mandate impossibilities that sound reason decisively refutes .
Editions
The work was edited and published in Cairo by Aḥmad Ḥijāzī al-Saqqā (Dār al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1398 AH / 1978 CE) . It was also edited as a doctoral dissertation by Fāyiz Saʿīd Ṣāliḥ ʿAzzām at Umm al-Qura University in Makkah during the 1405 AH academic year .
Answer updated