al-Fasl wal-Wasl fi al-Quran al-Karim
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Munsha'at al-Ma'arif
al-Fasl wal-Wasl fi al-Quran al-Karim: Dirasah fi al-Uslub (Disjunction and Conjunction in the Holy Quran: A Stylistic Study) is a rhetorical and stylistic work by the Egyptian scholar Munir Sultan . The book examines the rhetorical phenomena of al-fasl (disjunction or omission of conjunctions) and al-wasl (conjunction or joining clauses by connectives), tracking the historical evolution of the concept across Arabic linguistic disciplines and offering a critical stylistic reappraisal of classical rhetorical rules through direct application to the text of the Quran .
Background and Methodology
The work was conceived within Sultan's broader methodological framework of "rooting and renewal" (al-ta'sil wal-tajdid), which seeks to anchor rhetorical analysis in classical heritage while moving beyond late scholastic rigidities . Sultan argues that classical Arabic rhetoric became constrained by rigid scholastic formulations following the canonization of al-Sakkaki's system in Miftah al-Ulum (Key to the Sciences) and its later abridgments and commentaries . The book aims to liberate the study of disjunction and conjunction from sterile pedagogical rules, returning to the broader aesthetic and contextual horizons of the Quranic text .
In his historical introduction on the life cycle of rhetorical terminology (hayat al-mustalah), Sultan argues that the terminology of al-fasl and al-wasl originated in the science of Quranic recitation (ilm al-qira'at)—specifically the discipline of pause and resumption (al-waqf wal-ibtida')—as well as Arabic orthography and grammar, before being adopted and systematized within Arabic rhetoric .
Structure and Contents
The work is organized into an introduction, four principal chapters, and a conclusion :
- Introduction (Tamhid): Covers the development of terminology, dividing it into stages of instability, stability, and subsequent branching, and traces the origins of disjunction and conjunction across calligraphy, grammar, and Quranic recitation .
- Chapter One: Disjunction and Conjunction before al-Jurjani: Traces early treatments of the concepts among early grammarians such as Sibawayh, al-Farra', al-Mubarrad, and Ibn Jinni; rhetoricians and critics including al-Jahiz, Ibn Wahb, al-Suli, Abu Hilal al-Askari, and Ibn Sinan al-Khafaji; exegetes such as al-Tabari and al-Sharif al-Murtada; and theologians such as al-Qadi Abd al-Jabbar .
- Chapter Two: Disjunction, Conjunction, and al-Jurjani: Examines Abd al-Qahir al-Jurjani's foundational restructuring of the topic in Dala'il al-I'jaz (Signs of Inimitability), analyzing how he connected it to his theory of syntax and composition (nazm), established its grammatical anchors, and provided aesthetic analysis, while also noting how his reliance on theological reasoning (kalam) influenced subsequent treatments .
- Chapter Three: Disjunction and Conjunction after al-Jurjani: Divided into three sections:
- al-Zamakhshari: Explores his practical and aesthetic applications of disjunction and conjunction in his Quranic commentary al-Kashshaf .
- al-Sakkaki's Codification: Analyzes his systematization and compartmentalization of the subject in Miftah al-Ulum .
- The Summaries and Commentaries: Details al-Khatib al-Qazwini's formulations in Talkhis al-Miftah and al-Idah, as well as Baha' al-Din al-Subki's commentary in Arus al-Afrah .
- Chapter Four: Aesthetic Appreciation of Disjunction and Conjunction in the Noble Quran: Presents Sultan's critique of classical rules, classifies Quranic patterns of disjunction (between single words, sentence components, independent clauses, and entire passages), and discusses the various stylistic instruments and aesthetic functions of disjunction and conjunction, such as clarity, conciseness, structural cohesion, visual and structural representation, and the harmony between acoustic and semantic cadence .
Critique of Classical Rhetorical Rules
In the fourth chapter, Sultan identifies five major shortcomings in the conventional rules formulated by later rhetoricians :
- Restriction to Sentences: Classical theorists restricted disjunction and conjunction to relations between full sentences (jumal), whereas the Quran frequently employs both phenomena between single words (mufradat) and between individual sentence components .
- Restriction of Instruments: Theorists reduced disjunction strictly to the omission of the conjunction waw (tarh al-waw) and conjunction to waw alone, whereas the Quran executes disjunction using various tools—including resumptive particles (waw al-isti'naf, fa', thumma, bal, and disjunctive am), separating pronouns (dama'ir al-fasl), parenthetical clauses (al-jumlah al-mu'taridah), and severed exceptions (al-istithna' al-munqati')—and executes conjunction using all coordinating and connecting particles .
- Coordination of Declarative and Performative Clauses: Rhetoricians deemed disjunction between declarative (khabariyyah) and non-declarative/performative (insha'iyyah) sentences mandatory under the rule of absolute disconnect (kamal al-inqita'), whereas early grammarians such as Sibawayh permitted their coordination, and the Quran contains numerous instances of coordinating declarative and performative clauses .
- Scholastic Illustrative Examples: Rhetorical reliance on constructed examples—such as the phrase la wa-'afaka Allah ("No, and may God heal you") to illustrate kamal al-inqita' with potential misunderstanding—in fact exemplifies coordination between performative and declarative meanings, or could achieve clarity simply by omitting waw with an oral pause .
- Neglect of Overarching Context: The codified rules failed to account for overall thematic context and holistic coherence (al-siyaq al-jami'), becoming confined to narrow pedagogical exercises while overlooking the broad thematic unity of Quranic chapters and verses .
Publication
The book was published in Alexandria, Egypt, by Mansha'at al-Ma'arif, with its revised second edition appearing in 1997 .
Answer updated