al-Bida wa Atharuha

Author died
-
Editions
al-Maktabah al-Islāmīyah

al-Bid‘ah wa-Atharuhā al-Sayyi’ fī al-Ummah (Religious Innovation and Its Pernicious Impact on the Muslim Nation) is a treatise on Islamic theology and legal methodology by the Jordanian Salafi author Salim al-Hilali . Completed in early Dhu al-Hijjah 1403 AH (September 1983 CE) in Amman, Jordan, the work was composed as a concise introduction to the textual foundations governing religious innovation (bid‘ah) and as an accessible stepping stone to lengthier classical authorities on the topic .

Purpose and Classical Influences

Al-Hilali conceived the booklet to elucidate Quranic verses and authentic prophetic hadiths warning against religious inventions . He explicitly positioned the treatise as a primer leading to five major classical texts:

  • al-I‘tiṣām by al-Shatibi
  • al-Ḥawādith wa-l-Bida‘ by Abu Bakr al-Turtushi
  • Iqtiḍā’ al-Ṣirāṭ al-Mustaqīm by Ibn Taymiyyah
  • al-Bida‘ wa-l-Nahy ‘Anhā by Ibn Waddah
  • al-Bā‘ith ‘alā Inkār al-Bida‘ wa-l-Ḥawādith by Abu Shamah al-Maqdisi

Content and Method

The treatise examines the definition of bid‘ah linguistically and legally. Linguistically, it traces the term to something originated without prior precedent . Legally, the author defines it as an invented way in religion that mimics the Sharia, intended to seek proximity to Allah, yet lacking authentic legal evidence in either its foundation or specific form . By specifying the intent of seeking proximity to Allah, al-Hilali excludes modern worldly inventions (such as automobiles or aircraft) and administrative tools (such as compiling books), arguing that worldly means accept the five legal rulings (al-aḥkām al-khamsah), whereas devotional innovations do not .

A central theme of the work is the refutation of dividing religious innovations into "good" (ḥasanah) and "bad" (sayyi’ah), or applying the five rulings to religious matters as articulated by al-‘Izz ibn ‘Abd al-Salam . Al-Hilali maintains that all religious innovations are blameworthy, relying on the prophetic pronouncement كل بدعة ضلالة ("Every innovation is misguidance") and reports from early authorities such as Malik ibn Anas, al-Shafi‘i, and Ahmad ibn Hanbal . He also argues against attempts to interpret the prophetic condemnation of bid‘ah as referring merely to specific forbidden sins (ma‘āṣī), noting that doing so nullifies the specific legal function and force of the hadith .

Reception and Scholarly Assessment

Contemporary researchers of legal theory have analyzed the treatise within modern literature on religious innovation. In Ḥaqīqat al-Bid‘ah wa-Aḥkāmuhā, Sa‘id ibn Nasir al-Ghamidi classified the work among texts that summarize and adapt foundational principles from classical authorities—particularly al-Shatibi's al-I‘tiṣām—while incorporating supplementary discussions . While commending the author's defense of the early Sunni path, al-Ghamidi noted critical observations, including al-Hilali's formulation of a definition of bid‘ah that combined al-Shatibi's words with additions of his own without distinguishing between them in citation, as well as aspects of his engagement with rational good and bad (al-taḥsīn wa-l-taqbīḥ al-‘aqliyyān) .

Publication History

The book was first published by al-Maktabah al-Islamiyyah in Amman, Jordan, in 1404 AH (1984 CE) . It saw subsequent printings, including a second edition by the same publisher in 1406 AH (1986 CE) and a fourth edition in 1420 AH (1999 CE) .

Answer updated