Ahadith Di'af wa Alayha al-Amal bighayr Khilaf
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Maktabat al-Taw'iyah al-Islamiyyah lil-Tahqiq wal-Nashr
Ahadith Di'af wa Alayha al-Amal bighayr Khilaf (Weak Hadiths Upon Which Practice is Based Without Disagreement) is a contemporary hadith study by Abu Abd al-Rahman Atif ibn Hasan al-Faruqi . The book examines specific Prophetic traditions whose chains of transmission (isnad) are weak, but whose underlying legal and creedal meanings are established by scholarly consensus (ijma') and acted upon across Islamic jurisprudence without dispute .
Background and Methodology
The work was introduced with a foreword by Tariq ibn Awadullah, who highlighted the traditional methodological distinction between transmission (riwayah) and applied understanding (dirayah) . He noted that classical authorities such as Ahmad ibn Hanbal, al-Shafi'i, Abu Dawud, and al-Tirmidhi routinely accommodated narrations with light weakness when supported by the practice of the early community, Quranic texts, or undisputed legal principles .
In his introduction, al-Faruqi elaborates on this framework by citing classical scholars—including al-Tirmidhi, Ibn Abd al-Barr, and Ibn al-Arabi—who observed that a hadith may lack an authentic chain yet remain sound in meaning due to broad acceptance and practical implementation among jurists . For each selected tradition, the author provides an exhaustive collection and critical evaluation of its transmission lines (takhrij), details the rulings of hadith critics, and documents the consensus of early scholars (Salaf) affirming its meaning .
Structure and Contents
Following the introduction, the book is organized into five main parts:
- Chapter One (Creed): Examines the narration القرآن كلام الله غير مخلوق ("The Quran is the speech of Allah, uncreated") . It traces the transmission lines through thirteen Companions—including Ali ibn Abi Talib, Abdullah ibn Mas'ud, Abu Sa'id al-Khudri, Jabir ibn Abd Allah, Abu Hurayrah, Abu al-Darda, Mu'adh ibn Jabal, Abu Musa al-Ash'ari, Anas ibn Malik, Abdullah ibn Abbas, Rafi' ibn Khadij, Abu Hakim al-Shami, and Abdullah ibn Abd al-Ghafir—before establishing the theological consensus of the Salaf regarding the uncreated nature of the Quran .
- Chapter Two (Purification): Focuses on the hadith الماء لا ينجسه شيء إلا ما غلب على ريحه... ("Water is not made impure by anything except that which overcomes its smell...") . It evaluates the narrations of Abu Umamah al-Bahili, Thawban, and the mursal report of Rashid ibn Sa'd, recording scholarly agreement on water altered by impurities and examining whether consensus functions independently or requires an underlying textual basis (mustanad) .
- Chapter Three (Prayer): Analyzes the tradition الصلاة خلف كل بر وفاجر ("Prayer [is valid] behind every righteous person and sinner") . It investigates routes from Abu Hurayrah, Ali ibn Abi Talib, Abdullah ibn Umar, Ibn Mas'ud, Abu al-Darda, Wathilah ibn al-Asqa', Mu'adh ibn Jabal, and Abu Umamah, concluding with classical consensus and analytical remarks from Ibn Taymiyyah .
- Chapter Four (Financial Transactions): Investigates the legal maxim narrated as a hadith, كل قرض جر نفعا فهو ربا ("Every loan that brings a benefit is usury") . It reviews the reports attributed to Ali ibn Abi Talib, the mursal chain of Muhammad ibn Ka'b al-Qurazi, parallel reports, statements from the Companions, and the legal consensus prohibiting loans conditioned on stipulated increases .
- Chapter Five (Conclusion and Indices): Summarizes the main findings and provides comprehensive scholarly indices, including a subject index, analytical points of benefit, and an index of criticized narrators (al-ruwah al-majruhin) mentioned throughout the text .
Answer updated