Adab al-Khilaf - Yasser Burhami
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Adab al-Khilaf - Yasser Burhami
Adab al-Khilaf (أدب الخلاف, "The Etiquette of Disagreement") is a contemporary Islamic treatise by the Egyptian Salafi preacher Yasir Burhami that addresses the jurisprudence and behavioral ethics governing intellectual and religious differences among Muslims .
Context and Purpose
The work addresses internal discord among various Islamic groups and trends, identifying factional friction over the methods, goals, and priorities of proselytization (daʿwah) as one of the primary internal obstacles facing the contemporary Islamic revival . Burhami frames differences in human thought as a divinely decreed reality, emphasizing that facing these trials serves as a test to distinguish truth from falsehood . While calling for unity around divine revelation, the work rejects the assertion that all Islamic groups must be excused unconditionally on the grounds of shared goodwill or broad objectives, arguing that major methodological deviations cannot be overlooked as mere variations in path .
Categorization of Disagreement
The treatise classifies religious differences into broader theological categories:
- Differences of Diversity (Ikhtilāf Tanawwuʿ): Praiseworthy variations that accommodate valid and legitimate forms of action or expression without mutual contradiction .
- Differences of Contradiction (Ikhtilāf Taḍādd): Contradictory divergences that are subdivided into permissible and blameworthy categories .
- Permissible Disagreement (Al-Khilāf al-Sāʾigh): Matters rooted in probabilistic textual evidence (adillah ẓanniyyah) that allow for multiple interpretive deductions or methods of reconciliation, encompassing both secondary doctrinal issues and juristic practical matters where the early generations (al-Salaf) historically held differing views .
- Impermissible Disagreement (Al-Khilāf Ghayr al-Sāʾigh): Blameworthy divergence defined as any position directly contradicting an explicit text of the Quran, the authentic Sunnah, scholarly consensus (ijmāʿ), or a clear definitive analogy (qiyās jalī) . Opposing clear prophetic traditions on the basis of late scholars' opinions or factional adherence is deemed impermissible and outside the scope of acceptable ijtihad .
Ethics and Applications
In permissible matters of disagreement, Burhami emphasizes maintaining fraternal ties, gentle engagement, and restricting critique to academic discussion and mutual advising, warning against attributing ignorance, deviance, or abandonment of the Sunnah to those holding valid alternative positions . Permissible differences do not justify religious animosity (al-bughḍ fillāh) or societal estrangement .
In dealing with blameworthy and non-permissible divergence, the author distinguishes between evaluating erroneous doctrines and judging individual adherents . Regarding historical sects such as the Muʿtazilah, non-extremist Shiites, the Qadariyyah, the Jabriyyah, and non-extremist Sufis, he notes that while their doctrines may constitute grave innovations, individuals are deemed innovators (mubtadiʿah) rather than excommunicated (takfīr), due to the prevalence of ignorance, until conclusive textual proof (iqāmat al-ḥujjah) is established against them .
Answer updated