Tawjih al-Mutashabih al-Lafzi fi al-Quran al-Karim inda al-Mufassirin - Dirasa fi Tafsiri al-Razi wa al-Alusi
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Tawjih al-Mutashabih al-Lafzi fi al-Quran al-Karim inda al-Mufassirin - Dirasa fi Tafsiri al-Razi wa al-Alusi
Tawjih al-Mutashabih al-Lafzi fi al-Quran al-Karim inda al-Mufassirin – Dirasa fi Tafsiri al-Razi wa al-Alusi (Explanation of Verbally Similar Verses in the Noble Quran according to Exegetes: A Study of the Commentaries of al-Razi and al-Alusi) is a Quranic studies work by Reem Abd al-Fattah al-Buhayri . The book examines the methods used by Quranic commentators to analyze and harmonize verbally similar Quranic verses (al-mutashabih al-lafzi), taking the commentaries of Fakhr al-Din al-Razi and Shihab al-Din al-Alusi as primary case studies .
Purpose and Scope
The study focuses on the discipline of al-mutashabih al-lafzi, a branch of Quranic sciences concerned with clarifying the rhetorical and semantic reasons for differences between similar expressions across various passages of the Quran, demonstrating rhetorical nuances, and refuting claims of redundancy or mere repetition . Noting the utility of distinguishing such verses for accurate memorization and contemplation, the author surveys how general exegetes, rather than dedicated authors of mutashabih manuals alone, contributed to this field . The book selects al-Razi's Mafatih al-Ghayb and al-Alusi's Ruh al-Ma'ani to examine how each commentator explained these recurring textual variations .
Structure
The work comprises an introduction, four main chapters, a conclusion, and indices of verses, prophetic traditions, sources, and subjects :
- Introduction: Outlines the research problem, objectives, literature review, and study plan .
- Chapter One: Defines al-mutashabih linguistically and technically, outlines the importance of the science, reviews prominent historical authors in the field, and categorizes the types of verbal similarity in the Quran .
- Chapter Two: Examines al-Razi's biography and his commentary Mafatih al-Ghayb, detailing his methodology, sources, relationship to dedicated mutashabih scholars, unique interpretations, criticisms of his method, and applied examples across various categories of verbal similarity .
- Chapter Three: Presents al-Alusi's biography and Ruh al-Ma'ani, discussing the characteristics of his hermeneutical approach, cited sources, stance toward earlier specialists, unique contributions, criticisms, and representative examples .
- Chapter Four: Conducts a comparative evaluation of al-Razi and al-Alusi, analyzing overarching methodological distinctions, shared positions and divergences at the levels of particles (huruf) and phrasing/syntax (al-lafz wa-l-tarkib), and instances where each commentator provided independent interpretations .
Exegetical Approaches and Findings
The study identifies key differences and commonalities between the two commentators:
- Coverage and Style: Al-Razi addressed approximately 300 instances of verbal similarity in his commentary, frequently employing an interrogative question-and-answer format reminiscent of al-Khatib al-Iskafi's method in Durrat al-Tanzil . Al-Alusi treated roughly 150 instances, presenting differences directly without framing them as dialogical objections, akin to Burhan al-Din al-Kirmani's presentation . Both authors generally combined conciseness with selective elaboration .
- Hermeneutical Tools: Al-Razi integrated linguistic analysis, syntax, canonical variant readings (qira'at), jurisprudence, hadith, and textual context . Al-Alusi similarly drew on syntax, qira'at, semantic context, end-rhyme considerations (fawasil), and the principle of stylistic variation (al-tafannun fi al-ta'bir) .
- Original Contributions: Compared to specialized works of mutashabih, al-Razi provided unique explanations for more than 100 cases, whereas al-Alusi offered independent explanations for over 40 cases .
The author concludes that comprehensive commentaries contain substantial independent contributions to al-mutashabih al-lafzi that expand beyond traditional dedicated treatises, and recommends further investigation into other major commentaries .
Answer updated