Tarikh Dimashq li-Ibn al-Qalanisi
- Author died
- 555 AH
- Editions
- Dār Ḥassān lil-Ṭibāʻah wa-al-Nashr, li-Ṣāḥibihā ʻAbd al-Hādī Ḥarṣūnī
Tarikh Dimashq (also known as Dhayl Tarikh Dimashq [The Continuation of the History of Damascus]) is a historical chronicle written by the Damascene statesman and scholar Abu Ya'la Hamza ibn Asad ibn al-Qalanisi (d. 555 AH / 1160 CE), covering the history of Damascus and the Levant from 360 AH (970–971 CE) down to the year of his death in 555 AH (1160 CE) .
Composition and Structure
The work is structured as a chronological chronicle organized by year (annalistic format) . Ibn al-Qalanisi designed his chronicle as a continuation (mudhayyal) based on earlier historical writings, primarily connecting to the history of Hilal ibn al-Muhassin al-Sabi (and earlier records related to Thabit ibn Sinan), which began with events from the year 360 AH .
Biographers noted varying dates for where Ibn al-Qalanisi's independent continuation began: Ibn Asakir stated that he authored a history for events after 440 AH, whereas Yaqut al-Hamawi placed the start at 441 AH . Ibn al-Qalanisi himself indicated within his text that his continuation resumed with events from the year 448 AH onwards, which he continued up to 555 AH .
Content and Scope
Covering nearly two centuries of history, the book focuses primarily on Damascus and Syria, while also incorporating wider regional developments concerning the Fatimid Caliphate, the Abbasid Caliphate, and even events in the Islamic West, such as the emergence of Ibn Tumart and the Almohad Caliphate .
Key historical subjects detailed in the chronicle include:
- The conflict between the Qarmatians and the Fatimids over control of Syria .
- The turbulent era of Fatimid governance in Damascus, including frequent administrative changes, confiscations, local Syrian resistance, urban topography, and the social dynamics of local groups and tribes .
- The entry of the Seljuks into Syria .
- Eyewitness accounts of the First and Second Crusades, documenting the arrival of European armies in Asia Minor and the Levant, their campaigns, and the Muslim responses .
Method and Sources
Ibn al-Qalanisi served twice as head of the chancery (diwan al-insha') and also directed the tax administration (diwan al-kharaj) in Damascus, which gave him direct access to official state documents, political correspondence, and firsthand information .
In detailing his methodology, Ibn al-Qalanisi explained that he gathered reports from reliable eyewitnesses, examined evidence critically, and maintained notes on ongoing events . When interrupted between 535 AH and 540 AH, he left blank leaves between annual entries to verify facts before writing them into the final text . He also made a deliberate stylistic choice to omit inflated administrative honorifics and royal titles that had become common among contemporary rulers to avoid repetition and prolixity .
Manuscript and Publications
The text has survived in a single unique manuscript preserved at the Bodleian Library at the University of Oxford (MS Hunt 125), which is missing fourteen folios at the beginning containing the author's preface and opening entries .
The work was first edited by the British orientalist Henry Frederick Amedroz and published in 1908 by Brill in Leiden (printed in Beirut by the Jesuit Press), accompanied by an English summary, footnotes drawn from related historical manuscripts, and analytical indices . A later critical edition was prepared by Suhayl Zakkar and published in Damascus in 1403 AH / 1983 CE, addressing textual corruptions and scribal errors present in the earlier print . Due to its status as a primary contemporary Arabic account of the early Crusading period, portions of the chronicle have also been translated into English and French .
Reception and Influence
Tarikh Dimashq was recognized by medieval Muslim historians as an authoritative source for the history of Syria and the early Crusades. Later chroniclers, including Ibn al-Athir, Sibt Ibn al-Jawzi, and Shams al-Din al-Dhahabi, cited and relied upon its material for their own universal histories .
Answer updated