Tanbih al-Wulat wa al-Hukkam ala Ahkam Shatim Khayr al-Anam aw Ahad Ashabihi al-Kiram alayhi wa alayhim al-Salat wa al-Salam
- Author died
- 1252 AH
- Editions
- Dars‘ādat
Tanbih al-Wulat wa al-Hukkam ala Ahkam Shatim Khayr al-Anam aw Ahad Ashabihi al-Kiram (Alerting Governors and Judges to the Legal Rulings Concerning One Who Reviles the Best of Creation or One of His Noble Companions) is a legal treatise by the Syrian Hanafi jurist Ibn Abidin (d. 1252 AH / 1836 CE) . The work examines the jurisprudential rulings, penal consequences, validity of repentance, and criteria of excommunication (takfir) regarding individuals who revile the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ or his Companions .
Background and Sources
Ibn Abidin composed the treatise after observing that earlier Hanafi scholars had not comprehensively elaborated on the precise legal parameters of this question . To clarify the topic, he drew upon major works written across different Sunni schools of law, notably al-Qadi Iyad's Maliki reference Kitab al-Shifa, Ibn Taymiyyah's Hanbali treatise al-Sarim al-Maslul ala Shatim al-Rasul—of which Ibn Abidin noted having consulted an old manuscript featuring Ibn Taymiyyah's own handwriting—and the Shafi'i jurist Taqi al-Din al-Subki's al-Sayf al-Maslul ala Man Sabba al-Rasul .
Structure and Contents
The work is organized into two main parts (bab):
- Part One (al-Bab al-Awwal): Focuses on the legal ruling regarding one who reviles the Prophet ﷺ and is divided into three sections (fusul):
- The obligation of capital punishment if the offender does not repent, addressing scholarly consensus and whether the punishment is executed on grounds of apostasy (kufr) or as a prescribed legal penalty (hadd) .
- The offender's repentance and demanding repentance (istitabah), establishing and verifying the authentic doctrine of Abu Hanifa and his school on the acceptance of repentance .
- The ruling concerning a non-Muslim protected subject (dhimmi) who reviles the Prophet .
- Part Two (al-Bab al-Thani): Focuses on the legal rulings concerning one who reviles any of the Prophet's Companions .
Legal Arguments and Significance
In the treatise, Ibn Abidin addresses misconceptions in later Hanafi literature, particularly disputing claims transmitted by al-Bazzazi that the reviler cannot be pardoned even if he repents . Demonstrating that the authoritative Hanafi position, as well as the Shafi'i position, accepts the offender's repentance, he cautions muftis and judges against issuing rulings of execution when repentance is made or when interpretive ambiguity (shubhah) is present .
Regarding the Companions, he distinguishes between explicit doctrinal denial that contradicts conclusive textual evidence—such as slandering A'isha, denying Abu Bakr's companionship, deifying Ali, or claiming the angel Gabriel erred in delivering revelation—and non-apostatizing heresy or transgression driven by false interpretation or personal bias, where discretionary chastisement (ta'zir) applies rather than takfir . Ibn Abidin frequently cross-references these conclusions in his legal marginalia Radd al-Muhtar ala al-Durr al-Mukhtar .
Transmission and Publication
The work survives in manuscript form across several libraries, including copies held at the Alexandria Municipal Library and the Zahiriyya Library in Damascus . It was published as the fifteenth epistle in Ibn Abidin's compendium of treatises (Majmu'at Rasa'il Ibn Abidin) and has also appeared in standalone critical editions .
Answer updated