Shubuhat Hawl al-Quran
- Author died
- 1441 AH
- Editions
- Shubuhat Hawl al-Quran
Shubuhat Hawl al-Quran (Doubts Concerning the Quran) is an apologetic and exegetical work written by the Egyptian Islamic scholar and intellectual Dr. Muhammad Imara (d. 1441 AH / 2020 CE) to address and refute ten contemporary criticisms and alleged discrepancies raised against the text of the Quran .
Background and Purpose
The book was composed as a scholarly and theological response to a set of ten specific questions presenting various objections raised against the Quran . Imara contextualizes the work within the Quranic framework of al-tadafu' al-fikri (intellectual contention between truth and falsehood), arguing that engaging with such objections is both a religious duty and a catalyst for invigorating Muslim thought against intellectual stagnation and religious doubt . He emphasizes that the Quran itself did not ignore the objections of its detractors—whether polytheists, materialists, or earlier scriptural communities—but recorded and dismantled their claims, challenging opponents to provide sound proof .
Structure and Core Themes
The work consists of an introduction (taqdim), ten thematic chapters responding to each of the ten doubts (shubuhat), a conclusion (khatimah), and a bibliography . Across these chapters, Imara addresses:
- The Stages of Human Creation: Refuting claims of contradiction between verses describing man as created from dust, clay, altered black mud, sounding clay, or fluid by demonstrating that these terms depict complementary chronological stages of Adam’s initial creation and subsequent biological human reproduction .
- Prophet Ibrahim and Monotheism: Explaining that Ibrahim's contemplation of celestial bodies (the star, moon, and sun) was a dialectical method of debate (hujjah) designed to refute his people's polytheism step-by-step, rather than an actual phase of polytheism, since prophets are protected from shirk .
- The Obedience of Angels and the Disobedience of Iblis: Reconciling the inherent obedience of angels with the rebellion of Iblis, explaining that Iblis belonged to the category of jinn, who possess moral volition .
- Universal Submission and Human Disobedience: Distinguishing between God’s deterministic, cosmic decree (qada' takwini) over non-volitional creation—where all creatures submit—and the normative decree concerning humans endowed with free choice (ikhtiyar) and moral accountability .
- The Duration of Cosmic Creation: Reconciling the six-day creation narrative with Surah Fussilat by explaining that the four days mentioned encompass the initial two days of the earth's formation, and clarifying that "days" (ayyam) in the Quran signify divine, non-human cosmic epochs rather than standard 24-hour periods .
- Discrepancies in Historical Names: Addressing differences between biblical and Quranic names—such as Azar versus Terah for Ibrahim's father, and al-Aziz versus Potiphar for the Egyptian official in the story of Yusuf—noting title variations, phonetic shifts across translations, and corruptions in biblical transmissions .
- Maryam Addressed as "Sister of Aaron": Clarifying that calling Maryam «أُخْتَ هَارُونَ» ("sister of Aaron") in Surah Maryam was a verbatim quotation of her people's accusation against her, rather than a factual genealogical misidentification by the Quran .
- The King Who Confronted Ibrahim: Demonstrating that the Quran never named the disputing king Nimrod (al-Namrud), and that such naming originated from extra-Quranic historical reports and commentaries that are non-binding upon the Quranic text .
- Dhul-Qarnayn and Alexander the Great: Distinguishing the monotheistic, just ruler praised in the Quran from the historical polytheist Alexander the Great, pointing out that classical authorities questioned the identification .
- The Sun Setting in a Murky Spring: Explaining that the Quran's description of Dhul-Qarnayn finding the sun setting in a murky spring reflects the visual perception (ru'yah basariyyah) of an observer looking over the horizon at the boundary of inhabited land, rather than a scientific assertion of astronomy .
Methodology and Sources
Imara employs an analytical method centered on interpreting the Quran through the Quran (tafsir al-Quran bi-l-Quran), examining verses holistically rather than in isolation . He emphasizes precise lexical definitions of Quranic terms to dispel misunderstandings, cautioning against conflating the authentic Quranic text with unverified historical narratives (isra'iliyyat) or popular lore . He notes that none of these ten doubts were raised during the era of prophetic revelation, indicating that they are late inventions arising from decontextualized readings .
To support his arguments, Imara draws on Arabic lexicons such as Ibn Manzur's Lisan al-'Arab and al-Raghib al-Isfahani's al-Mufradat fi Gharib al-Quran, classical exegeses including al-Qurtubi's al-Jami' li-Ahkam al-Quran and al-Zamakhshari's al-Kashshaf, and modern works such as Muhammad Abduh's collected writings (al-A'mal al-Kamilah) and Abd al-Wahhab al-Najjar's Qasas al-Anbiya' .
Answer updated