Sharh Hadith al-Iftiraq
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Sharh Hadith al-Iftiraq
Sharh Hadith al-Iftiraq (Commentary on the Hadith of Sectarian Division) is an Islamic theological treatise and transcribed commentary by the contemporary Saudi scholar Yusuf al-Ghafis (b. 1380 AH / 1960 CE), examining the prophetic tradition regarding the fragmentation of the Muslim community into seventy-three sects and the related theological principles of heresy and excommunication (takfir).
Background and Context
The work constitutes an analytical commentary on a treatise by Ibn Taymiyyah addressing the hadith of sectarian division (Hadith al-Iftiraq), the methodology of the early Muslim generations (salaf) regarding the fundamentals of faith (usul al-din), and the parameters governing takfir. Al-Ghafis delivered these lectures following his commentary on Kitab al-Iman (The Book of Faith) by Abu 'Ubayd al-Qasim ibn Sallam, pointing out the organic connection between the two subjects: understanding the rules of takfir is inherently derived from grasping the early theological doctrine of faith (iman), its increase and decrease, and the relationship between faith, sin, and outward Islam.
Content and Method
In the commentary, al-Ghafis addresses several core theological and hadith-critical issues:
Authenticity of the Hadith
Al-Ghafis explains that the Hadith al-Iftiraq was narrated on the authority of several Companions, including Abu Hurayrah, Anas ibn Malik, and Abdullah ibn Umar, and was recorded by Ahmad ibn Hanbal in his Musnad as well as the compilers of the Sunan collections. He notes that it is not included in the two Sahih collections of al-Bukhari and Muslim, leading hadith scholars to differ over its standing: some critics, such as Ibn Hazm, declared it unauthentic, while a group of scholars, including Ibn Taymiyyah, considered it strengthened through its collective chains of transmission. Al-Ghafis argues that definitively establishing its authenticity is not strictly consequential for theological doctrine, since the emergence of theological factionalism among Muslims is an indisputable historical fact.
The Enumeration of the Seventy-Three Sects
The commentary examines the specific prophetic mention of seventy-three sects, characterizing it as broad knowledge ('ilm kulli) rather than an exhaustive register. Al-Ghafis maintains that precisely determining every individual deviant sect among the seventy-two is impossible:
- Grouping theological trends by their primary root innovations yields very few major factions—conventionally identified by the early scholars as the Murji'ah, Qadariyyah, Jahmiyyah, and Rafidah (Shi'a).
- Counting individual sects and subdivisions causes the total to far exceed seventy-two.
- Certain sects encompassed by the prophetic forewarning may only emerge in later periods toward the end of time.
The Threat of Hellfire and Rulings on Innovators
Al-Ghafis clarifies that the phrasing كلها في النار إلا واحدة ("all of them are in the Fire except one") belongs to the category of general warning texts (ahadith al-wa'id), analogous to Quranic warnings directed at sinners and wrongdoers. According to the salaf, it does not imply that every member of an aberrant group is guaranteed damnation or expelled from the fold of Islam, though severe ideological deviance can in specific cases reach outright heresy (zandaqah) or disbelief.
Regarding excommunication, al-Ghafis summarizes the categorization established by early authorities:
- Groups whose disbelief was agreed upon by consensus, such as the extreme Jahmiyyah.
- Groups concerning whose excommunication scholars differed, such as the Khawarij and the Rafidah.
- Groups regarding whose non-excommunication scholars agreed, such as the Murji'ah and moderate Shi'a (al-Shi'ah al-mufaddilah).
He underscores the standard Sunni hermeneutic distinction that refraining from declaring an individual proponent of an innovation a disbeliever does not imply that the innovation itself lacks elements of disbelief.
Answer updated