Sarih al-Maqul al-Muwafiq li-Sarih al-Manqul fi Munaqashat Thalathat Tafasir Ruttibat ala Tartib al-Nuzul

Author died
-
Editions
Prof. Dr. ‘Abd al-Fattāḥ Maḥmūd Idrīs

Sarih al-Maqul al-Muwafiq li-Sarih al-Manqul fi Munaqashat Thalathat Tafasir Ruttibat ala Tartib al-Nuzul (Clear Reason in Accordance with Authentic Tradition: A Discussion of Three Quranic Commentaries Arranged According to Revelation Order) is a contemporary treatise in Quranic sciences by Arafa bin Tantawi dedicated to refuting the trend of organizing exegeses according to the chronological order of revelation (tartib al-nuzul) rather than the standard codex order (al-tartib al-mushafi) .

Purpose and Scope

The author composed the work to defend the established Uthmanic arrangement of the Quran, arguing that organizing exegesis by chronological revelation breaks with scholarly consensus and undermines the divinely ordained sequence preserved by the Companions of the Prophet and subsequent generations . Using a descriptive and analytical methodology, Tantawi examines textual and rational proofs regarding the nature of the Quran's arrangement, surveys the origins of modern chronological ordering among Western Orientalists, and provides a focused critique of three prominent modern commentaries that adopted this approach .

Structure and Contents

The book is arranged into an introduction, two major chapters, and a conclusion .

Introductory Material

The preface and introduction outline the significance of the topic, its research objectives, and previous literature in the field—notably the study al-Tafasir Hasab Tartib al-Nuzul fi al-Mizan by Mustafa Muslim .

Chapter One: The Divinely Ordained Status of Codex Order

Titled Tawqif al-Tartib al-Mushafi lil-Ayat wal-Suwar, this chapter contains six sections (mabahith) demonstrating that the standard sequence of verses and chapters is divinely mandated (tawqifi) :

  • Section 1: Argues that the placement of verses within chapters is strictly tawqifi and delineates the two dimensions of codex arrangement .
  • Section 2: Presents evidence for verse ordering, highlighting chapters that were revealed in their entirety at one time (jumlatan wahidah) .
  • Section 3: Reviews the three scholarly positions on surah arrangement: that it was established by Companion ijtihad, that it is entirely tawqifi, or that it combines both .
  • Section 4: Compiles statements from classical and contemporary scholars who maintained that surah order is divinely ordained .
  • Section 5: Examines key proofs for divine ordainment, including the consensus of the Companions on the Uthmanic codex, their division of the text into regular reading portions (tahzib), and structural correspondences across consecutive chapters with similar openings .
  • Section 6: Investigates the historical origins of chronological reordering, detailing early historical dissent, the role of Western Orientalists in promoting chronological schemes, and modern Muslim writers influenced by them .

Chapter Two: Critique of Three Chronological Exegeses

The second chapter comprises three detailed sections devoted to evaluating the three target works :

  • Section 1 (Bayan al-Ma'ani): Analyzes the commentary by Abd al-Qadir Mulla Huwaysh (d. 1398 AH), covering the author's background, his primary source texts, interpretive methodology, existing scholarly studies on the book, and a detailed refutation of his stated justifications for following revelation order .
  • Section 2 (Al-Tafsir al-Hadith): Evaluates the work of Muhammad Izzat Darwaza (d. 1404 AH), analyzing his arguments—including the legal rulings (fatwas) he relied upon—his motives, methodology, theological positions on divine attributes, and prior critical assessments of his commentary .
  • Section 3 (Ma'arij al-Tafakkur wa-Daqa'iq al-Tadabbur): Assesses the unfinished commentary of Abd al-Rahman Habannaka al-Maydani (d. 1425 AH), examining his background, theological perspectives, exegesis methodology based on his earlier treatise Qawa'id al-Tadabbur al-Amthal lil-Qur'an al-Karim, and his rationales for chronological sequencing .

The treatise concludes by asserting that chronological arrangements failed to achieve their authors' intended educational or thematic goals, reiterating the scholarly obligation to uphold the canonical sequence of the Uthmanic codex .

Answer updated