Riayat al-Maslaha wal-Hikma fi Tashri Nabi al-Rahma

Author died
-
Editions
الجامعة الإسلامية بالمدينة المنورة

Riayat al-Maslaha wal-Hikma fi Tashri Nabi al-Rahma (Observing Public Interest and Wisdom in the Legislation of the Prophet of Mercy ﷺ) is a contemporary legal treatise on Islamic legal theory and jurisprudence written by Dr. Muhammad Tahir Hakim . The study examines the centrality of public interest (maslaha) and divine wisdom (hikma) within prophetic legislation, addressing both theoretical principles and substantive legal derivations .

Background and Purpose

The treatise was authored while Hakim served as an assistant professor at the Faculty of Sharia in Nouakchott, Mauritania . It was published in the Journal of the Islamic University of Madinah in issue 116 (Year 34, 1423 AH / 2002 CE) .

Hakim composed the work to demonstrate the importance of both explicitly stated (mansus) and juristically deduced (mustanbat) legal interests, asserting that a sound understanding of the Quran and the Prophetic Sunna is unattainable without grasping the higher objectives (maqasid) and benefits for which rulings were instituted . He framed the research as an effort to illuminate the inner wisdoms of Islamic legislation, reinvigorate jurisprudence (tajdid al-fiqh), and protect legal scholarship from stagnation (jumud) .

Contents and Structure

The treatise is organized into thematic sections structured according to objective legal analysis, employing accessible language and classical juristic terminology :

  • Definitions and Terminology: Hakim examines the definitions of maslaha, hikma (wisdom), 'illa (effective cause), and sabab (legal reason) . He contrasts classical usage—where hikma was frequently used interchangeably with the Lawgiver's intent (qasd al-shari')—with later technical distinctions that differentiate between the explicit legal cause ('illa) and the resulting benefit or fruit (hikma) . Hakim defines maslaha as "that which sound intellects and uncorrupted dispositions dictate of rectitude, fulfilling the objective of the Lawgiver and servants in the welfare of worldly life and the hereafter" .
  • Classification of Interests: The work discusses explicitly stipulated interests versus unstated interests that jurists deduce through legal reasoning, citing examples such as the obligation of prayer for God's remembrance, jihad for eliminating tribulations and elevating God's word, and legal retribution (qisas) for deterring bloodshed .
  • Critique of Opponents of Teleological Causation: The author reviews and refutes the arguments of scholars who denied the teleological causation of legal rulings (ta'lil al-ahkam bil-masalih), including Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, groups among the Ash'aris, and the Zahiris, who held that divine commands stem from pure divine will rather than underlying purposes . Hakim affirms alongside mainstream jurists that God's actions and laws are grounded in wisdom, while clarifying that the ultimate obligating source of a ruling is God Himself, not the interest or wisdom in isolation .
  • Evaluation of Consequences and Conditions: The treatise outlines the methodology for evaluating benefits and harms, the necessity of considering consequences and long-term outcomes (al-nazar ila al-ma'alat), and the essential criteria required for an interest to be legally valid and recognized (shurut al-maslaha al-mu'tabara) .

Answer updated