Qawl al-Falasifa al-Yunan al-Wathaniyyin fi Tawhid al-Rububiyya
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- al-Jāmi‘ah al-Islāmīyah bi-al-Madīnah al-Munawwarah
Qawl al-Falasifa al-Yunan al-Wathaniyyin fi Tawhid al-Rububiyya (The Doctrine of the Pagan Greek Philosophers Concerning the Unity of Divine Lordship) is an Islamic theological study by Saud bin Abdul Aziz al-Khalaf analyzing and refuting ancient Greek philosophical concepts of God and divine lordship from the perspective of the early Muslim community (Salaf) . It was published in 2002 (1423 AH) in the Journal of the Islamic University of Madinah (issue 120) .
Background and Scope
The treatise examines how ancient Greek philosophical doctrines regarding the divine emerged from unassisted human intellect and prevailing pagan environments rather than divine revelation . Al-Khalaf identifies these philosophical premises—specifically the habit of drawing analogies from observable creation to the unseen (qiyas al-gha'ib 'ala al-shahid)—as the foundational source of theological negation (ta'til) that later influenced theological schools such as the Jahmiyya and the Mu'tazila, as well as speculative theologians (mutakallimun), the Batiniyya, and philosophical Sufism .
Structure and Contents
The work is organized into an introduction, two main chapters, and a conclusion :
- Introduction (al-Muqaddima): Discusses human deviations regarding knowledge of God, the role of Greek thinkers in advancing speculative theology without divine guidance, and how their pagan-influenced ideas spread into other intellectual traditions .
- Chapter One: A Brief Definition of the Salaf's Doctrine of Tawhid (Ta'rif Mujaz bi-Madhhab al-Salaf fi al-Tawhid): Opens with preliminary definitions of the Salaf and tawhid, followed by an exposition of the categories of divine unity affirmed by the Salaf (rububiyya, uluhiyya, and al-asma' wa-al-sifat) .
- Chapter Two: The Doctrine of the Philosophers Regarding Tawhid (Qawl al-Falasifa fi al-Tawhid): Begins with an introductory definition of philosophy and philosophers, followed by two core sections :
- Section One: Examines and refutes the claims of atheist philosophers (malahidat al-falasifa) who deny the existence of a Creator .
- Section Two: Examines and refutes the claims of deist or theist philosophers (al-mu'allihah min al-falasifa), dividing the discussion into their views on God's existence and attributes, and their views on the creation and origin of the cosmos .
- Conclusion (al-Khatima): Outlines the primary findings of the study .
Key Conclusions
The treatise concludes that divine revelation transmitted through the prophets is the only reliable means of acquiring true knowledge of God, whereas unaided human intellect is inherently vulnerable to environmental, cultural, and pagan preconceptions . It highlights that Greek philosophical statements regarding the divine are internally contradictory and fundamentally fail to establish true divine lordship (rububiyya) or active creation, often reducing God to an abstract necessity while assigning the actual creation and administration of the universe to intermediate emanations .
Answer updated