Mukhtasar al-Qawaid al-Salafiya fi al-Sifat al-Rabbaniya

Author died
-
Editions
Maktabat Salsabeel

Mukhtasar al-Qawaid al-Salafiya fi al-Sifat al-Rabbaniya (Abridgment of Salafi Principles Regarding the Divine Attributes) is a contemporary theological treatise authored by Mahmud Abd al-Razzaq Ridwani, dedicated to clarifying the foundational principles of affirming the divine attributes according to the Salafi school of Islamic creed .

Background and Purpose

Ridwani prepared the work in response to requests from students of knowledge seeking a concise, accessible manual summarizing the methodology of the early Muslim generations (al-salaf al-salih) regarding the divine names and attributes . The text aims to present these doctrinal rules in clear, direct language, free from convoluted rhetoric, ambiguity, or factional polemics, drawing primarily upon the broader heritage of the salaf and the works of Ibn Taymiyya in particular . It serves as a pedagogical abridgment of more detailed treatises on the subject, notably his work Tawhid al-Sifat bayna Mu'taqad al-Salaf wa-Ta'wil al-Khalaf .

Structure and Content

The treatise is organized around four core axes, each dedicated to a fundamental rule governing the affirmation of divine attributes and paired with specific doctrinal pitfalls (mahذورat) that must be avoided :

  • The First Axis: Focuses on negating any resemblance or parity between the Creator and His creation. Its section on pitfalls warns against applying human rational analogies to God, specifically identifying analogy of representation (qiyas al-tamthil) and universal inclusion (qiyas al-shumul), which lead to anthropomorphism (tashbih) and modality speculation (takyif) .
  • The Second Axis: Deals with accepting scriptural texts according to their apparent intended meaning without alteration. It outlines the dangers of theological negation (ta'til) and speculative figurative reinterpretation (ta'wil), demonstrating how these deviations arise from an initial presumption of anthropomorphism .
  • The Additional Axes: Conclude the methodological framework by addressing deviant definitions of monotheism (tawhid), such as the positions advanced by the Mu'tazila and the Ash'ari theological schools, which affirm divine names while stripping them of their real descriptive attributes .

Answer updated