Mawqif al-Istishraq min al-Sunna wa al-Sira al-Nabawiyya
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Islamic University - Faculty of Da'wah
Mawqif al-Istishraq min al-Sunna wa al-Sira al-Nabawiyya (The Stance of Orientalism toward the Sunna and the Prophetic Biography) is a critical treatise by the Iraqi historian Akram Diya' al-Umari that examines the historical development, motives, and methodologies of Western Orientalist scholarship regarding the Prophet Muhammad and the Prophetic Tradition .
Background and Context
The study originated in the context of academic teaching and research at the Islamic University of Madinah . It was published in the journal al-Muslim al-Mu'asir (issues 75–76) and later issued as an independent monograph . Al-Umari notes that during his university studies in the early 1950s, students frequently encountered Western scholarly theories presented by Arab professors without proper attribution to their European origins .
The author surveys the historical roots of Orientalism, beginning with early medieval ecclesiastical polemics fueled by the Crusades and Christian-Muslim contact in al-Andalus and Sicily . He details how this religious rivalry transitioned in the nineteenth century into state-supported academic enterprises aligned with European colonial expansion . Al-Umari highlights how racial theories, such as those formulated by Ernest Renan differentiating Semitic and Aryan minds, portrayed Semitic peoples as lacking capacity for abstract synthesis—a characterization echoed in H. A. R. Gibb's concept of the "atomistic" mind . The treatise also references Edward Said's Orientalism and the quantitative scale of the field, noting the publication of roughly 60,000 European books on Islam between 1800 and 1950, along with hundreds of specialized periodicals .
Analysis of Orientalist Approaches to the Sira
Al-Umari examines how Western scholars approached the biography of the Prophet (the Sira):
- Psychological and Secular Interpretations: The author analyzes the methods of W. Montgomery Watt in Muhammad at Mecca and Muhammad at Medina. While Watt acknowledged the Prophet's sincerity, he attempted to explain revelation as internal subconscious promptings and used psychoanalysis to account for stylistic differences between the Quran and hadith, which al-Umari criticizes as anachronistic historical projection .
- Claims of External Borrowing: The treatise critiques attempts to reduce Islamic monotheism and narrative content to Christian or Jewish sources via figures such as Bahira or Waraqa ibn Nawfal, arguing that thematic parallels in sacred narratives stem from a common divine origin rather than textual borrowing .
- Literary and Historical Hostility: Al-Umari reviews earlier portrayals, such as Dante Alighieri's placement of the Prophet in the lower inferno, alongside ambivalent assessments by writers like Thomas Carlyle and Gustave Le Bon, showing how superficial praise of Arab culture was often juxtaposed with critiques of the Quran and Islamic scripture .
Critique of Hadith and Sunna Studies
The treatise dedicates substantial focus to Orientalist scholarship on the Sunna and hadith literature:
- Foundational Figures: Al-Umari traces the earliest distinct Western treatments of hadith to Barthélemy d'Herbelot's seventeenth-century Bibliothèque orientale, followed by nineteenth-century studies by Aloys Sprenger, William Muir, and Leone Caetani, which cast doubt on the transmission of early chains of narration (isnad) .
- The Theses of Goldziher and Schacht: The author scrutinizes Ignaz Goldziher's argument that hadiths were fabricated during the second and third centuries AH to reflect later political and theological conflicts, as well as his allegation against Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri regarding the Umayyads . He likewise critiques Joseph Schacht's theory of "projecting back" (al-qadhf al-khalfi) and Schacht's assertion that legal hadiths did not exist before 150 AH .
- Nuances and Internal Debates: Al-Umari surveys responses within Western scholarship itself, noting how figures such as Johann Fück and Josef Horovitz rejected or qualified Goldziher's skepticism, and how James Robson modified earlier positions and defended aspects of early isnad use, while other scholars, such as David Samuel Margoliouth, Alfred Guillaume, and Noel Coulson, continued to argue that traditional hadith criticism focused solely on formal chain criteria rather than textual content (matn) .
Proposed Remedies
Al-Umari concludes the treatise by outlining a two-part approach for contemporary Muslim scholarship: first, rebuilding an autonomous intellectual understanding of Islamic history and creed directly from the Quran and the Sunna to educate and safeguard emerging generations; and second, preparing qualified scholars to articulate and present authentic Islamic perspectives internationally in major foreign languages .
Answer updated