Khabar al-Wahid wa Hujjiyatuh
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- عمادة البحث العلمي بالجامعة الإسلامية
Khabar al-Wahid wa Hujjiyatuh (The Solitary Report and Its Epistemic Authority) is a treatise on Islamic legal theory (usul al-fiqh) by the Mauritanian scholar Ahmad bin Abd al-Wahhab al-Shinqiti, examining the epistemic value and legal validity of solitary hadith transmissions (ahad) in creedal and legal matters .
Background and Purpose
The book was originally composed as a Master's thesis at Umm al-Qura University . The author noted that he selected the subject after returning to advanced academic studies following years of teaching . He was prompted by debates among scholars regarding the impermissibility of using solitary reports to establish theological doctrines (‘aqa’id) on the premise that such reports impart only probable knowledge (zann), whereas matters of faith require definitive knowledge (qat‘) . Al-Shinqiti framed the inquiry from the perspective of legal theory, examining the transmission of the Prophetic Sunnah as the second foundational source of Islamic jurisprudence after the Quran .
Methodology
Al-Shinqiti structured his analysis by detailing the divergent views of scholars, presenting their respective proofs, examining objections and counter-arguments, and stating his preferred conclusion (tarjih) based on the text of the Quran, the Sunnah, or definitive consensus (ijma‘ qat‘i) .
Structure and Contents
The work is organized into an introduction, a preliminary overview (tamhid), two main parts (bab), and a conclusion :
- Preliminary Overview (al-Tamhid): Covers foundational definitions and concepts, divided into five areas: the nature and divisions of a report (khabar) in language and technical terminology, including al-Jahiz's view on an intermediate state between truth and falsehood; the definition of the Sunnah; the classification of the Sunnah into sayings, actions, and tacit approvals (taqrir); the relationship and legislative independence of the Sunnah relative to the Quran; and the division of reports into mass-transmitted (mutawatir), solitary (ahad), and well-known (mashhur) .
- Part One (al-Bab al-Awwal): Focuses on the epistemic value imparted by solitary reports (Fi ma yufiduhu khabar al-wahid), containing three chapters:
- The position that solitary reports from an upright narrator impart only probable knowledge (zann) .
- The position that solitary reports impart certain knowledge (‘ilm) .
- The position that solitary reports impart certain knowledge when accompanied by corroborating contextual evidence (qara’in), concluding with the practical outcomes of the dispute (thamarat al-khilaf) .
- Part Two (al-Bab al-Thani): Focuses on the legal obligation to act upon solitary reports (Fi hukm al-‘amal bihi), divided into seven chapters:
- The obligation to act upon solitary reports .
- Arguments of those who deny the authority of solitary reports and their refutations .
- Relying on solitary reports in legal opinions (fatwa), testimony (shahadah), and worldly transactions .
- Accepting solitary reports in fixed penal prescribed punishments (hudud) .
- Solitary reports in relation to the practice of the people of Medina (‘amal ahl al-Madinah) .
- Solitary reports concerning matters of widespread public necessity (ma ta‘ummu bihi al-balwa) .
- Instances where a narrator's personal action contradicts their own narration .
- Conclusion (Khatimah): Summarizes the findings of the study, noting that even if an unaccompanied solitary report does not independently generate certainty, acting upon its implications remains obligatory in both core tenets (usul) and derived rulings (furu‘), and that solitary reports accompanied by corroborating indicators yield certain knowledge .
Publication
The work was published by the Academic Council and the Deanship of Scientific Research at the Islamic University of Madinah .
Answer updated