Ikhtilaf al-Darayn wa Atharuhu fi Ahkam al-Sharia al-Islamiyya
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Deanship of Scientific Research at the Islamic University
Ikhtilaf al-Darayn wa Atharuhu fi Ahkam al-Sharia al-Islamiyya (The Difference of the Two Abodes and Its Effects on the Rulings of Islamic Law) is a work of comparative Islamic jurisprudence by Abd al-Aziz bin Mabrouk al-Ahmadi that examines the legal division of territories into Islamic and non-Islamic abodes and its impact across various branches of Islamic law .
Composition and Publication
The work originated as al-Ahmadi's doctoral dissertation in comparative jurisprudence at the Islamic University of Madinah, written under the academic supervision of Abdullah ibn Ahmad Qadiri, head of the jurisprudence division in the Department of Higher Studies . Al-Ahmadi chose the subject because classical jurists did not dedicate an independent book or chapter to territorial differences, but rather dispersed related legal rulings across disparate sections of jurisprudence compendia . The book was published in two volumes by the Deanship of Scientific Research at the Islamic University of Madinah in its first edition in 1424 AH (2004 CE) .
Scope and Structure
The book is structured into an introduction, a preliminary study, two main parts, a conclusion, and analytical indices :
- Preliminary Study (Tamhid): Covers the linguistic and legal definitions of jihad, its scriptural legitimacy, legal status, categories, virtues, and underlying wisdom .
- Part One: Defines the territorial abodes, their inhabitants, the evidence for dividing the world, and restricted areas :
- Chapter 1: Examines the definition of dar (abode), the characterization and residents of Dar al-Islam (including permanent non-Muslim residents [dhimmis] and temporary entrants granted safe conduct [musta'minun]), the definition and divisions of Dar al-Kufr (the Abode of Disbelief, categorized into Dar al-Harb and Dar al-Ahd), and the conditions under which an abode's status changes .
- Chapter 2: Discusses the scriptural evidence for dividing the earth into two abodes, addresses the attribution by Abu Zayd al-Dabbusi to al-Shafi'i that the earth is a single abode, and critiques contemporary scholars who hold that view .
- Chapter 3: Details the territories that non-Muslims are prohibited from entering or settling, including the Arabian Peninsula, the Sacred Sanctuary of Mecca, the Prophet's Mosque in Medina, and other mosques .
- Part Two: Investigates the legal impact of territorial divergence across six chapters :
- Chapter 1: Retaliation (qisas), blood money (diya), and expiation (kaffara) regarding a temporary non-Muslim resident (musta'min) in the Abode of Islam .
- Chapter 2: Prescribed penalties (hudud) and related criminal offenses committed in the Abode of Islam, including unlawful intercourse (zina), false accusation of unchastity (qadhf), theft (sariqa), banditry (hiraba), rebellion (baghy), and espionage .
- Chapter 3: The effect of territorial difference on jihad, encompassing emigration (hijra) from the Abode of Disbelief and the division of spoils in non-Muslim territory .
- Chapter 4: Financial transactions and family law, including engaging in interest-bearing contracts (riba) in Dar al-Harb, marrying non-Muslim women of the Book in Dar al-Harb, and marital dissolution caused by territorial separation .
- Chapter 5: Criminal offenses (qisas and hudud) committed within the Abode of Disbelief .
- Chapter 6: Inheritance (mirath) and bequests (wasiyya), including inheritance among non-Muslims, the estate of an apostate, and bequests made to a combatant non-Muslim (harbi) .
Method and Sources
Al-Ahmadi's methodology relies on comparative legal analysis across the four recognized Sunni legal schools (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali), arranged in chronological order, alongside the views of the Companions, Successors, and the Zahiri school . For disputed legal points, he presents the opposing arguments, documents the reasons for disagreement (asbab al-ikhtilaf), evaluates the textual and rational evidence, and concludes with a justified preference (al-ra'y al-mukhtar) . Positions of each madhhab are cited directly from their primary canonical treatises, and hadith narrations are traced to classical collections such as the Sahihayn, the Sunan compendia, and the Musannaf works of Abd al-Razzaq and Ibn Abi Shayba .
Answer updated