Ijma al-Muhaddithin
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Dār ʻĀlam al-Fawāʼid lil-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʻ
Ijma al-Muhaddithin (Arabic: إجماع المحدثين, fully titled Ijma al-Muhaddithin ala Adam Ishtirat al-Ilm bi-l-Sama fi al-Hadith al-Mu'an'an bayn al-Muta'asirayn, "The Consensus of Hadith Scholars on Not Stipulating Knowledge of Direct Audition in Mu'an'an Hadith Between Contemporaries") is a specialized treatise on hadith methodology by the Saudi scholar Hatim al-Awni, first published in 1421 AH (c. 2000 CE) by Dar Alam al-Fawa'id in Mecca .
Background and Central Thesis
The work addresses a classical dispute in hadith terminology concerning chain continuity (ittisal) in mu'an'an reports (transmissions phrased with the preposition 'an, meaning "from") between contemporary narrators . In the introduction to his Sahih, Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj maintained that contemporaneousness (mu'asara) and the possibility of meeting suffice to establish continuity for a narrator not accused of obfuscation (tadlis), claiming consensus (ijma') among hadith specialists and rebuking an unnamed dissenter . However, al-Qadi Iyad (d. 544 AH) later attributed a stricter requirement—demanding verified proof of meeting and direct audition (sama') at least once—to al-Bukhari and his teacher Ali ibn al-Madini, a position subsequent authorities such as Ibn al-Salah (d. 643 AH) adopted and popularized .
Al-Awni argues that this attribution to al-Bukhari is historical error and that early hadith scholars unanimously agreed with Muslim's criterion . He contends that requiring explicit evidence of audition prior to accepting mu'an'an narrations from non-concealing contemporaries is contrary to the methodological consensus of classical authorities, which included Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Yahya ibn Ma'in, Abu Hatim al-Razi, Abu Zur'ah al-Razi, al-Bazzar, Ibn Khuzaymah, Ibn Hibban, and al-Daraqutni .
Structure and Contents
The monograph consists of a single volume of 179 pages organized into an introduction and six primary subjects (masa'il) :
- Definition of Terms: Clarifying the conditions attributed to al-Bukhari, the standard articulated by Muslim, and the stricter requirements posited by Abu al-Muzaffar al-Sam'ani .
- Origins of the Attributed Condition: Tracing the history of attributing the requirement of confirmed audition to al-Bukhari, examining its textual basis, and analyzing instances where critics declared lack of audition without intending to reject chain continuity .
- Arguments Against the Stricter Attribution: Presenting fifteen distinct proofs to demonstrate the invalidity of attributing the condition of verified meeting to al-Bukhari and other early masters . These arguments cite transmission practices in Sahih al-Bukhari, the consensus recorded by Muslim and later transmitted by scholars like al-Hakim al-Naysaburi, Abu Amr al-Dani, al-Bayhaqi, Ibn Abd al-Barr, and Ibn Hazm, and the prolonged silence in hadith literature regarding any such dispute between Muslim's era and al-Qadi Iyad .
- Validity of Muslim's Position: Analyzing Muslim's dialectical reasoning based on both textual consensus and methodological principles, specifically that the term 'an customarily indicates connected transmission among reliable non-concealing narrators .
- Practical Implications for Hadith Literature: Outlining the ramifications of this principle across the broader corpus of prophetic traditions and defending the status of Sahih Muslim .
- Refutation of Remaining Objections: Answering final counter-arguments raised by modern and late classical interlocutors .
Reception and Scholarly Criticism
The book provoked discussion among contemporary researchers of hadith sciences. Critics, such as Ibrahim ibn Sa'id al-Subayhi in his work al-Nukat al-Jiyad, wrote extended rejoinders against al-Awni's conclusions . Al-Subayhi argued that claiming consensus among figures like al-Bukhari and Ibn al-Madini in favor of Muslim's position represented an unprecedented stance that failed to account for authentic differences in stringency between early critics .
Answer updated