Hukm Takrar al-Jamaa fi al-Masjid
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Islamic University of Madinah
Hukm Takrar al-Jama'ah fi al-Masjid (The Ruling on Repeating Congregational Prayer in a Mosque) is a contemporary jurisprudence treatise by Muhammad Tahir Hakim, Assistant Professor at the International Islamic University in Islamabad . The research was published in issue 120 (1423 AH / 2002 CE) of the Majallat al-Jami'ah al-Islamiyyah bi-al-Madinah al-Munawwarah (Journal of the Islamic University of Madinah) .
Scope and Purpose
The study investigates the Islamic legal ruling concerning the establishment of a second or repeated congregational prayer (takrar al-jama'ah) within a mosque after the primary congregation led by the appointed regular prayer leader (al-imam al-ratib) has ended . The author outlines the areas of scholarly consensus, details the differing legal positions of classical jurists and their textual evidence, evaluates their arguments, and synthesizes a preferred conclusion in light of the higher objectives and benefits of Islamic law (maqasid al-shari'ah) .
Points of Scholarly Agreement
The treatise begins by identifying cases where repeating congregational prayer is not disliked (makruh):
- Roadside and transit mosques: Mosques situated along public roads without an established local congregation; jurists agreed that repeating congregations in such mosques is unproblematic, and it is preferable for each consecutive group to deliver its own call to prayer (adhan) and call to commence (iqamah) .
- Mosques without an appointed imam or mu'adhin: Consensus holds that repeating prayer in such venues carries no dislike .
- Prayer of the regular imam after outsiders: If travelers or non-locals pray first in a neighborhood mosque with the adhan and iqamah, the majority of jurists hold that the regular imam and local residents may subsequently hold their congregation without dislike .
Legal Disagreement and Arguments
The central dispute centers on a neighborhood mosque that has a designated regular imam and known congregants, when latecomers arrive after the primary congregation has finished . The treatise categorizes the juristic dispute into two main positions:
Dislike of a Second Congregation
The Hanafi, Maliki, and Shafi'i legal schools—as well as early authorities such as al-Hasan al-Basri, Abu Qilabah, al-Qasim ibn Muhammad, Ibrahim al-Nakha'i, Sufyan al-Thawri, Ibn al-Mubarak, Salim ibn 'Abd Allah, al-Layth ibn Sa'd, and al-Awza'i—held that latecomers should pray individually rather than form a second congregation .
Proponents of this view relied on:
- A hadith reported by Abu Bakrah stating that the Prophet ﷺ returned from the outskirts of Madinah intending to pray, but found that the congregation had finished, so he went to his home, gathered his family, and prayed with them; they argued that had a second congregation in the mosque been approved, he would not have bypassed the merit of praying in his mosque .
- The hadith of Abu Hurayrah where the Prophet contemplated burning down the homes of those who failed to attend the primary congregation .
- The rational consideration that permitting recurrent congregations leads to the depletion of the primary congregation, because worshippers would delay their arrival knowing an alternative congregation would follow .
Permissibility of a Second Congregation
Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Ishaq ibn Rahwayh, Ashhab ibn Abd al-Aziz, and Ibn Hazm—along with reports from Anas ibn Malik, Ibn Mas'ud, Ata ibn Abi Rabah, Qatadah, and Adi ibn Thabit—maintained that repeating the congregation after the regular imam is permissible and not disliked . Imam Ahmad restricted this allowance outside the two holy mosques of Mecca and Medina, where he deemed repetition disliked to preserve the attendance of their primary congregations .
Supporters of permissibility argued from:
- The general hadiths praising the virtue of congregational prayer over individual prayer by twenty-five or twenty-seven degrees .
- The hadith of Abu Sa'id al-Khudri, wherein a man arrived after the Prophet ﷺ had prayed, and the Prophet ﷺ asked: أيكم يتجر على هذا؟ ("Who will trade with this man?"), whereupon a companion stood and prayed with him .
- The practice of Anas ibn Malik, who entered the mosque of Banu Tha'labah after the morning prayer had ended, instructed a man to call the adhan and iqamah, and led his companions in congregation .
Author's Conclusion
After evaluating both positions, Muhammad Tahir Hakim concludes that the ruling depends on context and motive:
- Repetition is prohibited and disallowed if motivated by dissent against the appointed imams, factionalism, or when used by sectarian groups to display religious innovations and separate from the wider community, in order to preserve unity and close avenues of discord .
- When individuals arrive late due to a genuine excuse without intention of schism or defiance, repeating the congregation is not disliked but legally prescribed (yushra'), harmonizing the relevant legal texts and their underlying rationale .
Answer updated