Hukm al-Tamthil
- Author died
- 1429 AH
- Editions
- Dar al-Rayah lil-Nashr wa-al-Tawzi'
Hukm al-Tamthil (The Ruling on Acting; full title: al-Tamthil: Haqiqatuhu, Tarikhuhu, Hukmuhu) is a jurisprudential treatise by the Saudi scholar Bakr Abu Zayd (d. 1429 AH / 2008 CE) examining the historical origins, forms, and legal ruling of theatrical acting and drama in Islamic law .
Background and Structure
The book addresses drama and theatrical performance as a contemporary development (nazilah) that has become widespread through radio, television, theaters, and clubs . It was published in its first edition by Dar al-Raya in Riyadh in 1411 AH (1990/1991 CE) .
The work is organized into seven sections (mabahith):
- Prior Literature: A survey of earlier writings on the issue, whether addressed independently or within broader legal texts .
- Reality and Terminology: Defining acting (al-tamthil) and related linguistic terms .
- History and Origins: Tracing its historical roots in customary entertainment and religious rituals among the ancient Greeks and Christians .
- Types: Categorizing different forms of drama and theatrical production .
- Aims and Objectives: Examining the purposes for which drama is performed .
- Jurisprudential Grounding: Analyzing the legal framework and categorizations through which acting is assessed in Islamic jurisprudence .
- Doubts and Rebuttals: Responding to the arguments presented by contemporary scholars who permit acting with specific conditions .
Legal Arguments and Stance
Abu Zayd concludes that acting is prohibited across all aspects of its practice, performance, commercial exploitation, broadcasting, and viewing . He classifies acting into two principal categories:
- Religious Acting (al-tamthil al-dini): He designates this as an unlawful religious innovation (al-tamthil al-bid'i), arguing that methods of da'wah and acts of worship are strictly scripturally determined (tawqifiyyah), and that theatrical performance originated within pagan Greek rituals and Christian religious practices rather than Islamic tradition .
- Customary Acting: In customary or secular domains, he deems it prohibited due to unlawful imitation (tashabbuh) of non-Muslims and the legal infractions inherent in performance . These include uttering fabrications and falsehoods (kadhkib) when staging fictitious events, physical mimicry (muhakah), which jurists classify as an actionable form of backbiting (ghibah fi'liyyah), and behaviors that violate personal dignity and chivalry (kharm al-muru'ah), rendering a person's legal testimony invalid in Islamic courts .
Responding to contemporary jurists who permit purposeful or educational drama under specific conditions, Abu Zayd argues that issuing verdicts of conditional permissibility neglects practical reality, as such fatwas are frequently exploited as a pretext to bypass religious restrictions . He maintains that even if acting were considered conditionally permissible in theory, the overwhelming societal corruptions and harms associated with it in modern times would necessitate a ruling of absolute prohibition to block the means to harm (sadd al-dharia) .
Answer updated