Hukm al-Ihram min Jeddah
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Hukm al-Ihram min Jeddah
Hukm al-Ihram min Jeddah (The Ruling on Entering Ihram from Jeddah) is a contemporary juridical treatise by Adnan al-Arur examining whether the city of Jeddah functions as a valid station (miqat) for entering the state of ritual consecration (ihram) for pilgrims performing Hajj and Umrah .
Background and Composition
The work is an abridgment of a longer, detailed research project that the author had prepared regarding the rulings on the mawaqit (designated stations of ihram), the ruling on someone traveling between two mawaqit, and the precise geographical meaning of alignment (muhadhah) . Because the original study contained extensive technical sections and numerous diagrams that made it difficult for general readers to navigate, al-Arur condensed it into a concise treatise to make its arguments accessible to the wider Muslim public, noting that readers seeking fuller citations and diagrams should consult the unabridged original .
Content and Arguments
The author frames the core question not merely as theoretical legal reasoning (ijtihad), but as a practical matter of understanding the proper definition of muhadhah and applying it to real-world geography . Following the introduction, the book defines key technical terms used throughout the text—such as the traveler heading to Mecca (al-qasid), the original station (al-miqat al-asli), and the supplementary station (al-miqat al-idafi)—before reviewing the sharia-designated mawaqit and their respective distances from Mecca under the heading "Bayna Yaday al-Mawaqit" .
Al-Arur argues through several proofs that any point on earth must either lie inside the perimeter of the mawaqit, outside it, or along the perimeter itself . On this basis, he concludes:
- Pilgrims arriving in Jeddah from the west by sea or air do not need to assume ihram until reaching Jeddah itself, because they do not cross or align with any miqat before reaching the coast .
- Those arriving from other directions must assume ihram from their designated miqat, unless they intend to defer entering ihram until reaching Jeddah for a specific purpose—particularly those with work or business there—in which case they enter ihram from its coast .
In his conclusion, al-Arur asserts that this position is not an innovation, drawing upon the reported practice of Abdullah ibn Umar and Aisha, as well as the legal preference of Ibn Taymiyyah and other scholars .
Reception and Critique
The treatise and its related version, Adillat Ithbat Anna Jiddah Miqat, drew significant scholarly debate and official opposition from Saudi religious authorities. The Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta issued a formal statement—signed by Grand Mufti Abd al-Aziz ibn Baz, Abd al-Aziz Al al-Shaykh, Abdullah ibn Ghudayyan, Salih al-Fawzan, and Bakr Abu Zayd—rejecting the book's premise . The Committee ruled that Jeddah lies inside the perimeter of the mawaqit, and travelers arriving by air, sea, or land must enter ihram upon passing or aligning with one of the Prophet's designated mawaqit rather than delaying it until reaching Jeddah .
Other contemporary jurists also criticized the work's technical premises: Ibrahim al-Subayhi described al-Arur's concept of penetrating the perimeter of the mawaqit as an unprecedented formulation that breaks scholarly consensus, while Dr. Sulayman al-Mulhim argued that jurists have traditionally defined muhadhah as direct parallel alignment with a single miqat at an equal distance from the Kaaba, rather than factoring in a perimeter between multiple stations simultaneously .
Answer updated