Hal Iftadana al-Masih ala al-Salib
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Dar al-Islam lil-Nashr wa-al-Tawzi'
Hal Iftadana al-Masih ala al-Salib (Did Christ Ransom Us on the Cross?) is a polemical work of comparative religion by Munqidh al-Saqqar, completed in Sha'ban 1424 AH (2003 CE), that critiques Christian doctrines regarding the crucifixion and atonement through biblical criticism and historical analysis . Published by Dar al-Islam li-l-Nashr wa-l-Tawzi', the work forms the fourth installment in the author's Silsilat al-Huda wa-l-Nur (Guidance and Light Series) .
Background and Purpose
The book addresses two primary questions central to Christian theology: a historical inquiry into whether Jesus was crucified, and a theological inquiry into whether such a crucifixion served as a universal ransom and redemption for humanity . Although the author maintains from previous volumes in the series that the Bible constitutes a human product rather than divine revelation, he approaches these questions dialectically by engaging the Christian biblical text on its own terms, while also appealing to rational principles and historical evidence . The work was finalized in Mecca and leads directly into the subsequent title of the series, Hal bashshara al-Kitab al-Muqaddas bi-Muhammad? (Did the Bible Prophesy Muhammad?) .
Content and Arguments
The text is organized around two principal thematic axes: refuting the historical occurrence of the crucifixion and disproving the doctrine of substitutionary atonement .
Historical Critique of the Crucifixion
In evaluating the narrative of the crucifixion, the author argues that Jesus was spared and delivered rather than crucified, with the traitorous disciple being ensnared instead . To demonstrate this, the book highlights:
- Internal discrepancies and contradictions among the Gospel accounts concerning the trial, the bearing of the cross, the timing, and the events surrounding the execution .
- Historical dissent within early Christianity, citing various early groups recorded by church historians who rejected Christ's crucifixion, such as the Basilidians, Cerinthians, Carpocratians, Saturninians, and Bardaisanites .
- Non-canonical Christian literature and archaeological discoveries, referencing texts from the Nag Hammadi library—such as the Apocalypse of Peter and the Second Treatise of the Great Seth—as well as the Gospel of Barnabas, which depict Jesus escaping execution while a substitute suffered in his place .
Theological Critique of Atonement and Redemption
The author analyzes the concept of salvation across Christian denominations, arguing that biblical passages present conflicting scopes of redemption—alternating between covering only Adam's original sin, all prior sins, or all present and future transgressions . The book rejects the premise of inherited guilt, asserting that Adam's sin remained personal to him and that humanity bears no moral liability for it .
The author identifies Paul as the primary architect behind the formulation of the doctrine of salvation through Christ's sacrificial blood, tracing its formalization to the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE, where it was incorporated into the universal creed . The book concludes that the notion of an incarnate deity dying to satisfy divine justice borrows from pre-Christian pagan traditions rather than genuine prophetic teachings .
Answer updated