Gharat al-Fasl ala al-Mutadin ala Kutub al-Ilal
- Author died
- 1422 AH
- Editions
- Dar al-Athar lil-Nashr wa-al-Tawzi'
Gharat al-Fasl ala al-Mutadin ala Kutub al-Ilal (The Decisive Raid upon the Transgressors Against the Books of Hadith Defects) is a polemical treatise on hadith criticism and hidden defects (ʿilal) by the Yemeni scholar Muqbil ibn Hadi al-Wadi'i (d. 1422 AH / 2001 CE) . The book defends the methodological authority of classical hadith critics and responds to contemporary challenges against specialized works on hadith defects .
Background and Occasion of Composition
Al-Wadiʿi authored the work in response to an article written by Ali Rida titled Ma Hakadha Tuʿallu al-Ahadith ("Not Thus Are Hadiths Declared Defective"), published in a newspaper . In the article, Ali Rida critiqued al-Wadiʿi's book Ahadith Muallat Zahiruha al-Sihhah (Defective Hadiths that Outwardly Appear Authentic), taking issue with four specific hadiths that al-Wadiʿi had classified as defective, such as the narration المؤمن يموت بعرق الجبين ("The believer dies with sweat on the brow") . The critic claimed that al-Wadiʿi had deemed sound narrations defective due to overlooking alternative transmission paths and corroborating witnesses .
Al-Wadiʿi stated in his introduction that he postponed other scholarly projects to compose this response not merely to defend himself, but because he saw the criticism as part of a wider trend among contemporary writers who disparaged the early masters of hadith criticism and undermined the classical literature of ʿilal . He initially intended to adopt a sharp and stern tone, but softened his language following the intercession of scholars residing in Medina .
Method and Contents
In addition to refuting the specific points raised by his critic, al-Wadiʿi incorporated broader principles concerning the discipline of hadith defect analysis . Addressing the definition of a defect (ʿillah), he noted that while standard manuals of hadith terminology (mustalah) define an ʿillah strictly as a subtle, concealed cause of weakness, early hadith critics often applied the term more broadly to include apparent defects—such as an overtly weak, unknown, or mendacious narrator—meaning the standard theoretical definition is predominant rather than absolute .
Al-Wadiʿi highlighted the precision and demanding nature of ʿilal, noting that navigating classical defect literature, such as Kitab al-ʿIlal by Ibn Abi Hatim, requires comprehensive knowledge of hadith transmission across the entire corpus . He attributed his own facility with the discipline to his extensive study and verification of the critical work al-Ilzamat wa-al-Tatabbu by al-Daraqutni .
Answer updated