Fi al-Mizan al-Jadid
- Author died
- 1385 AH
- Editions
- Nahḍat Miṣr lil-Ṭibāʻah wal-Nashr wal-Tawzīʻ
Fi al-Mizan al-Jadid (In the New Balance) is a book of literary criticism by the Egyptian critic and scholar Muhammad Mandur (1325?–1384 AH / 1907–1965 CE) . It is considered one of his most prominent critical works, representing the aesthetic impressionist phase of his career and articulating his theory of "whispered poetry" (al-shiʿr al-mahmus) alongside the application of French text-analysis methodology to Arabic literature .
Background and Composition
The book originated as a collection of critical essays that Mandur published in literary periodicals—chiefly al-Thaqafa and al-Risala—following his return to Egypt from France in 1939 . Drawing on his educational background in France, Mandur sought to connect contemporary Arabic literature with world literary currents through rigorous methods of text interpretation (explication de texte) and comparative evaluation . Mandur revised, expanded, and reorganized these articles over the five years following his return, publishing them in book form alongside two other works: Namadhij Bashariyya and a translated volume titled Min al-Hakim al-Qadim ila al-Muwatin al-Hadith .
Content and Method
The work reflects Mandur's aesthetic impressionism, an approach that prioritizes harmony with aesthetic values, refined personal taste, and close reading of literary texts over rigid psychological or dogmatic frameworks . Across its chapters, the book is structured around several major areas of inquiry:
- Contemporary Egyptian Literature: Mandur examines the nature and functions of criticism, the use of myth and symbolism, artistic style, and realism in fiction, analyzing works by figures such as Tawfiq al-Hakim, Bishr Faris, Ali Mahmud Taha, Mahmud Taymur, and Taha Husayn .
- Whispered Literature (al-Adab al-Mahmus): Mandur defines genuine poetry as a soft, intimate whisper addressing the listener rather than bombastic declamation loaded with rhetorical ornament . He presents the work of the Mahjar diaspora poets—such as Mikhail Naimy, Nasib Arida, and the prose writer Amin Mushriq—as prime models, contrasting their understated tone with declamatory Egyptian poetry .
- Classical Arabic Literature and Critical Heritage: The work applies modern critical approaches to the classical poet Abu al-Ala al-Ma'arri and his Risalat al-Ghufran, examines the rhetorical and critical theories of Abd al-Qahir al-Jurjani regarding poetic construction (nazm) and aesthetic taste (dhawq), and discusses the juristic critical method .
- Linguistic, Textual, and Metric Studies: The book contains discussions on Arabicization and phrasing, reviews the textual editing of Ibn Mammati's Qawanin al-Dawawin, and compares Arabic and European poetic meters .
Reception and Debates
Upon its appearance, Fi al-Mizan al-Jadid sparked substantial debate in Egyptian literary circles. Supporters, such as Husayn Mahmud al-Bishbishi, praised Mandur for his sincerity of feeling and expression, viewing his defense of whispered poetry as a profound contribution to contemporary Arabic letters .
Conversely, the book and its underlying articles drew sharp criticism in the pages of al-Risala. Sayyid Qutb argued that while Mandur excelled in setting forth general theories, he faltered in practical application, asserting that Mandur lacked the innate discernment needed to distinguish between authentic and superficial art . Qutb and Dirini Khashaba both challenged Mandur's promotion of Mahjar poets over Egyptian writers, claiming that his categorical dismissal of declamatory poetry stemmed from personal taste rather than objective critical standards .
Answer updated