Fasl al-Maqal li Ibn Rushd
- Author died
- 595 AH
- Editions
- Dār al-Ma‘ārif
Fasl al-Maqal (in full: Faṣl al-Maqāl fī-mā bayna al-Ḥikma wa-al-Sharīʿa min al-Ittiṣāl, "The Decisive Treatise on the Connection Between Wisdom and the Divine Law") is a treatise on Islamic jurisprudence, theology, and philosophy by the Andalusian judge and philosopher Ibn Rushd al-Hafid (520–595 AH / 1126–1198 CE) . The book examines the legal status of studying philosophy under Islamic law and establishes the essential harmony between rational demonstration and divine revelation .
Purpose and Composition
The work is recorded under the full titles Faṣl al-Maqāl fī-mā bayna al-Ḥikma wa-al-Sharīʿa min al-Ittiṣāl and Faṣl al-Maqāl wa-Taqrīr mā bayna al-Sharīʿa wa-al-Ḥikma min al-Ittiṣāl . Approaching the subject from the perspective of an Islamic jurist, Ibn Rushd composed the tract to address whether the investigation of philosophy (hikma) and logic (mantiq) is permissible, prohibited, or legally mandated—either as an obligation or a recommendation—by Islamic law . He framing his inquiry as a legal verdict (fatwa) intended to resolve longstanding tensions between traditional scholars and practitioners of demonstrative philosophy .
The treatise forms a central part of Ibn Rushd's theological-philosophical writings alongside Al-Kashf 'an Manahij al-Adilla (which serves as an appendix or continuation to it) and Tahafut al-Tahafut .
Core Arguments and Methodology
Ibn Rushd argues that divine revelation explicitly commands human beings to reflect upon creation and contemplate existing beings using the intellect, which in turn necessitates mastering rational syllogisms (al-qiyas al-'aqli) and logic . He draws an analogy to Islamic legal jurisprudence: just as the jurist is required to employ legal analogical deduction (al-qiyas al-fiqhi), the qualified philosopher is bound to employ demonstrative reasoning (al-qiyas al-burhani) . He maintains that utilizing the logical and metaphysical tools devised by pre-Islamic philosophers (such as Aristotle and the ancients) is permissible, provided they satisfy the conditions of validity, just as using a tool from a non-Muslim for ritual slaughter is permissible if the requisite legal conditions are met .
A central principle of the treatise is that "truth cannot contradict truth" (al-haqq la yudaddu al-haqq); demonstrative knowledge derived from sound reason inherently accords with what is revealed in the divine text . Ibn Rushd poetically describes wisdom/philosophy as the natural companion and "milk-sister" (al-ukht al-radi'a) of the divine law, asserting that both are joined by nature and affinity .
When an apparent contradiction arises between the literal wording of scripture (zahir al-shar') and the conclusive findings of demonstrative proof (burhan), Ibn Rushd asserts that the scriptural passage must be interpreted figuratively (ta'wil) in accordance with standard Arabic linguistic conventions . He notes that the consensus of Muslim scholars has never required taking all texts exclusively at their literal meaning, nor taking all texts exclusively through figurative interpretation, as seen in historical disagreements over theological descriptions such as divine establishment (istiwa') and descent (nuzul) .
Hermeneutics and the Classification of People
Ibn Rushd classifies human capacities and scriptural proofs into three broad categories:
- Demonstrative (burhani): Pertaining to philosophers and scholars capable of rigorous logical proof .
- Dialectical (jadali): Associated with the speculative theologians (mutakallimun) .
- Rhetorical (khitabi): Suitable for the broad majority of people (al-jumhur / the general public), who are persuaded through accessible examples and imaginative depictions .
Because the primary objective of scripture is to guide the multitude without neglecting the elite, its public expressions use methods accessible to all . Ibn Rushd insists that it is unlawful to disclose complex figurative interpretations (ta'wilat) to the general public, as doing so undermines their faith without providing them the demonstrative tools to understand higher metaphysical realities .
He criticizes theological factions—including the Ash'arites, Mu'tazilites, Batinites, and Hashwiyya—and reproaches scholars such as Abu Hamid al-Ghazali for disseminating dialectical interpretations and complex disputations among the masses, arguing that this practice caused religious discord, sectarianism, and mutual accusations of unbelief .
Reception and Legacy
Despite its brief length, Fasl al-Maqal became a landmark text in the study of Islamic philosophy and religion . It was translated into Latin and Hebrew during the medieval and early modern eras and drew substantial interest in modern intellectual scholarship on reason and revelation in Islam . Later scholars evaluated the work from diverse perspectives: while modernists and rationalist thinkers viewed it as an early formulation of enlightened interpretation and the harmony of philosophy and faith, other theological critics argued that its strict division of audiences and its hermeneutical principles placed philosophical reasoning above traditional theological formulations .
Answer updated