Durus fi Sharh al-Bayquniyya - Saad al-Humayd
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Durus fi Sharh al-Bayquniyya - Saad al-Humayd
Durus fi Sharh al-Bayquniyya (Lessons on the Commentary of al-Bayquniyya) is an instructional commentary by the Saudi hadith scholar Saad al-Humayd on al-Manzuma al-Bayquniyya, the classical didactic poem on hadith terminology composed by al-Bayquni .
Author and Context
The author, Saad ibn Abd Allah ibn Abd al-Aziz al-Humayd (b. 1374 AH / 1954–1955 CE), was born in Ta'if and traces his lineage to the Wahaba branch of the Banu Tamim tribe, with his family originating from the town of Ushayqir in the al-Washm region . He pursued higher education in the Department of Sunnah and Its Sciences at the College of Usul al-Din at Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University, earning his master's degree in 1407 AH and his doctorate in 1413 AH, and later joined the faculty of King Saud University . The text consists of a single-volume transcription of his educational lessons explaining the foundational principles of hadith nomenclature .
Content and Method
The commentary systematically explicates the verses of the poem, which encompasses thirty-two types of hadith sciences, comparing this count with broader classical classifications such as Ibn al-Salah's sixty-four categories in his Muqaddima, subsequently followed by al-Iraqi in his Alfiyya and al-Sakhawi in Fath al-Mughith .
Al-Humayd examines the technical requirements and definitions established by hadith scholars:
- The Authentic Hadith (al-Sahih): He details its conditions, including unbroken transmission (ittisal), narrator uprightness ('adala), and retention (dabt) . He discusses narrators who conceal sources (mudallisun), the components of uprightness, and divides retention into memory (dabt al-sadr) and written records (dabt al-kitab), noting that traditionists prioritize written preservation . He also delineates freedom from irregularity (shudhudh) and hidden defects ('illa), distinguishing obvious structural defects from subtle, latent flaws identified by expert critics .
- The Good Hadith (al-Hasan): He notes that al-Bayquni adopted his definition from al-Khattabi and reviews critiques of that formulation . In illustrating the concept of regional hubs of transmission (makhraj al-hadith), he lists prominent focal scholars across early Islamic centers, including Qatada in Basra, Abu Ishaq al-Sabi'i in Kufa, al-Awza'i in al-Sham, al-Layth ibn Sa'd in Egypt, Ibn Jurayj in Mecca, Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri in Medina, and Ma'mar ibn Rashid in Yemen . He contrasts this with the definitions offered by Ibn al-Salah and Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani in Nuzhat al-Nazar .
- The Weak Hadith (al-Da'if): He addresses the causes of narrational defect, dividing them into omissions in the chain—such as the hanging (mu'allaq), hurried (mursal), severed (munqati'), problematic (mu'dal), concealed (mudallas), and hidden hurried (al-mursal irsalan khafiyyan) reports—and impairments in narrator integrity or precision, citing Ibn Hajar's ten causes in Nukhbat al-Fikr .
Answer updated