Bayan Akhta al-Mujam al-Mufahras li-Alfaz al-Hadith al-Nabawi
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Majallat Jāmiʻat al-Malik Saʻūd - al-ʻUlūm al-Tarbawīyah wa-al-Dirāsāt al-Islāmīyah (2)
Bayan Akhta al-Mu'jam al-Mufahras li-Alfaz al-Hadith al-Nabawi (Clarification of the Errors of the Concordance of the Words of Prophetic Hadith) is a critical scholarly treatise written by Shakir Dhib Fayyad, published in 1412 AH (1992 CE) in the Journal of King Saud University – Educational Sciences and Islamic Studies . The study examines and categorizes the methodological, lexical, and textual shortcomings found in the multi-volume hadith concordance al-Mu'jam al-Mufahras li-Alfaz al-Hadith al-Nabawi (Concordance and Indices of Muslim Tradition) .
Background and Purpose
The monumental indexing project of al-Mu'jam al-Mufahras began in 1916 under the Dutch orientalist A. J. Wensinck, with its first volume published in 1936, the seventh in 1969 under J. P. Mensing, and the eighth index volume in 1988 by Jan Just Witkam . Fayyad noted that the extensive duration of the project, the changing teams of researchers with uneven abilities, and the heavy financial constraints that necessitated extensive abbreviation collectively introduced significant errors and irregularities into the work .
Fayyad wrote the treatise to provide an exhaustive, structured analysis of these flaws, arguing that prior critiques—such as the general observations offered by Mahmud al-Tahhan and 'Abd al-Mahdi 'Abd al-Hadi—were insufficient in scope and that the errata lists attached to the concordance itself did not address fundamental methodological defects . His stated aim was to assist hadith researchers navigating the work and to ensure that future indexing initiatives avoided repeating its mistakes .
Structure and Content
Excluding minor typographical misprints, Fayyad organizes the errors of al-Mu'jam al-Mufahras into eight core categories, illustrating each with concrete examples :
- Omission of root words and unsystematic pruning: The compilers intentionally omitted many foundational words and phrases from the nine indexed hadith collections to cut production costs, relying on subjective estimates of a word's "importance" or "commonality" rather than objective standards . This pruning also resulted in the accidental omission of several proper and geographical names from the index volume .
- Complete omission of certain hadiths: Entire prophetic traditions present in the primary collections (such as al-Muwatta, Sahih Muslim, Sunan al-Tirmidhi, and Musnad Ahmad) were entirely absent under any of their constituent words .
- Inclusion of non-hadith words: The concordance indexed non-prophetic phrases—such as explanatory remarks by narrators like Abu al-Salt 'Abd al-Salam ibn Salih, or statements by authors including al-Nasa'i, al-Tirmidhi, Abu Dawud, and Malik ibn Anas—on an equal footing with prophetic words, contradicting both the title and the abridgment policy of the work .
- Difficulty in utilizing cross-references: The work frequently redirected searchers to extensive lists of other terms containing dozens of sub-citations, or listed raw reference numbers across hundreds of chapters without contextual text snippets, creating severe practical burdens for researchers .
- Linguistic and morphological errors: The compilers occasionally derived words from incorrect linguistic roots (such as placing armalah under a-r-m-l rather than r-m-l, or derivatives of shakk under sh-k-w rather than sh-k-k) and misread or misvocalized specific hadith terms .
- Conflation of distinct passages into a single entry: Multiple distinct hadith phrases were sometimes merged into one continuous quotation with a combined list of sources, forcing the researcher to inspect every cited reference to locate a specific text .
- Separation of identical or similar passages: Conversely, closely matching or identical phrases under the same lemma were occasionally divided into separate entries with separate references without justification, rather than being consolidated .
- Mismatched text snippets: In certain entries, the cited textual excerpt under a root led to a completely different hadith in the referenced source that merely happened to share the same isolated lemma .
Critical Assessment
In concluding his work, Fayyad affirms that highlighting these shortcomings is intended as a constructive contribution to completing the utility of the concordance rather than disparaging it . He emphasizes that al-Mu'jam al-Mufahras remains a pioneering, indispensable reference for scholars and students engaged in the verification and attribution of hadith texts (takhrij) .
Answer updated