Awn al-Mabud wa Hashiyat Ibn al-Qayyim

Author died
1329 AH
Editions
Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyah

Awn al-Mabud wa Hashiyat Ibn al-Qayyim (The Help of the Worshipped: Commentary on Sunan Abi Dawud, published alongside the marginal gloss of Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya) is a multi-volume Hadith commentary that pairs the explanatory work Awn al-Mabud by the Indian scholar Muhammad Shams al-Haqq al-Azimabadi (d. 1329 AH / 1911 CE) and his brother Abu Abd al-Rahman Sharf al-Haqq Muhammad Ashraf (d. 1326 AH / 1908 CE) with Ibn al-Qayyim's (d. 751 AH / 1350 CE) critical commentary Tahdhib al-Sunan .

Authorship and Composition

Awn al-Mabud was composed as a concise commentary on Sunan Abi Dawud by Abu Dawud al-Sijistani (202–275 AH) . Al-Azimabadi had initially embarked on an exhaustive commentary entitled Ghayat al-Maqsud fi Hall Sunan Abi Dawud, but fearing he would not live to finish such an extensive project, he opted to produce an abridgment that would be accessible to scholars and students, completing it in seven years .

In the first edition and in the book's preface, the authorship of the first volume was credited to his brother, Abu Abd al-Rahman Sharf al-Haqq Muhammad Ashraf ibn Amir ibn Ali ibn Haydar al-Siddiqi al-Azimabadi . Later scholars noted that Muhammad Ashraf condensed the material under the direct guidance of Shams al-Haqq al-Azimabadi, who served as the primary author and enlisted the assistance of a circle of scholars, including Abd al-Rahman al-Mubarakfuri, Abu Abd Allah Idris ibn Abi al-Tayyib al-Diyanawi, his maternal uncle Abd al-Jabbar ibn Nur Ahmad al-Diyanawi, Qadi Yusuf Husayn Khan al-Hazarawi, and Muhammad al-Shahjahanpuri .

Method and Sources

The commentary is written in a direct, concise style following the methodology of the Ahl al-Hadith rather than adhering strictly to any single legal school . For the text of the Sunan, the author collated eleven manuscript copies—ten representing the transmission of al-Lu'lu'i and one from Ibn Dasah—while also noting variant readings transmitted by Ibn al-A'rabi, Ibn al-Abd, and al-Ramli .

In analyzing the narrations, the author drew heavily upon earlier reference works, particularly al-Khattabi's Ma'alim al-Sunan, Abd al-Azim al-Mundhiri's Mukhtasar Sunan Abi Dawud, and Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani's Fath al-Bari . The text systematically records al-Mundhiri's hadith evaluations—including his silence on unproblematic reports—and evaluates narrators by disambiguating names, providing proper vocalizations, and weighing grading criteria . While legal digressions are kept brief, the commentary elaborates on select controversial questions, such as the Friday prayer in rural villages, the number of Eid takbirs, the issue of three pronouncements of divorce at once, the funeral prayer in absentia, teaching women to write, the hadith on the reviver (mujaddid) of religion, signs of the Hour, and the status of the early historian Muhammad ibn Ishaq .

Integration of Ibn al-Qayyim's Hashiyah and Publication

Ibn al-Qayyim originally authored Tahdhib Sunan Abi Dawud as a marginal commentary and expansion upon al-Mundhiri's abridgment, resolving hidden defects (ilal) that al-Mundhiri had passed over, assessing hadith authenticity, and untangling problematic textual issues . Shams al-Haqq al-Azimabadi had earlier printed a portion of Ibn al-Qayyim's work in India in 1305 AH on the margins of the first volume of Ghayat al-Maqsud .

Awn al-Mabud was originally published alone in a four-volume lithograph edition in Delhi between 1318 and 1323 AH (1900–1905 CE) . It was later published in Egypt in a combined format initiated by Muhammad Abd al-Muhsin al-Salafi of al-Maktaba al-Salafiyya in Medina, edited by Abd al-Rahman Muhammad Uthman . Printed in Cairo between 1388 and 1389 AH (1968–1969 CE) across fourteen parts, this edition featured the core text of Sunan Abi Dawud at the top of the page, followed by Awn al-Mabud, with Ibn al-Qayyim's Tahdhib al-Sunan printed along the margins .

Reception

Awn al-Mabud gained wide circulation among students and scholars of Hadith . The Syrian scholar Muhammad Munir al-Dimashqi praised it as peerless among commentaries on the Sunan, stating that subsequent scholars in India and elsewhere drew extensively from it . Conversely, the Deobandi scholar Khalil Ahmad al-Saharanfuri remarked critically that while late Indian commentaries contain useful insights, Awn al-Mabud frequently oriented its discussions toward polemical refutations of the Hanafi school .

Answer updated