al-Wasita bayna al-Haqq wal-Khalq
- Author died
- 728 AH
- Editions
- Maṭābiʿ al-Jāmiʿah al-Islāmiyyah
al-Wasita bayna al-Haqq wal-Khalq (The Intermediary Between the Truth and Creation) is a theological treatise and legal responsa (fatwa) by Ibn Taymiyya (d. 728 AH / 1328 CE) clarifying the distinction between affirmed prophetic mediation and prohibited polytheistic intermediaries between God and mankind .
Origin and Scope
The treatise was written in response to an inquiry regarding a debate between two individuals, in which one argued that creation necessarily requires an intermediary to reach God . In answering the query, Ibn Taymiyya systematically divided the concept of mediation (wasita) into two fundamental categories: the legitimate mediation of messengers in conveying divine guidance, and the impermissible mediation of taking created beings as channels of worship, intercession, or supplication .
Core Themes and Arguments
Prophetic Conveyance and Religious Guidance
Ibn Taymiyya affirms that mediation is essential and affirmed by consensus across religious traditions when understood as the messengers conveying God's commands, prohibitions, reward, punishment, names, and attributes, which human intellect cannot independently deduce . To deny this form of mediation constitutes disbelief by consensus . Beyond the prophets, religious scholars and teachers serve as intermediaries between the Prophet and the community solely by transmitting knowledge, teaching, and disciplining, though no individual among them is infallible .
Prohibited Intermediaries and Polytheism
Conversely, the work argues that positing intermediaries to grant provision, victory, forgiveness of sins, or relief from hardship—or praying to them and placing reliance (tawakkul) upon them—is major polytheism (shirk) and disbelief by scholarly consensus . Ibn Taymiyya emphasizes that no human or angel acts as an intermediary in creating, providing, or guiding .
Refutation of the Ruler Analogy
A central section of the treatise refutes the false analogy comparing God to worldly kings who require chamberlains and courtiers . Ibn Taymiyya outlines three reasons why earthly monarchs depend on intermediaries:
- Lack of knowledge, requiring others to inform them of their subjects' needs—whereas God encompasses all secrets and hears all supplications directly .
- Incapacity and weakness, needing deputies and allies to maintain authority—whereas God is entirely self-sufficient, without partners or helpers .
- Lack of inherent motivation to show mercy, requiring external persuasion, advice, fear, or hope to prompt action—whereas God is the Creator of all causes, more merciful than a mother to her child, and acts without coercion .
The text clarifies that legitimate intercession (shafa'a) on the Day of Judgment occurs solely with God's permission and for those with whom He is pleased, rather than through pressure or independent authority .
Reception and Editions
The treatise has been widely printed both independently and within collections of Ibn Taymiyya's works. It is included in Majmu' al-Fatawa within the first volume . In modern times, Rashid Rida commended the work in his journal al-Manar, highlighting its defense of pure monotheism alongside Ibn Taymiyya's treatise Raf' al-Malam 'an al-A'imma al-A'lam . Independent editions have been edited and published by several scholars, including an edition prepared by Muhammad Jamil Zayno and printed by the Islamic University of Madinah .
Answer updated