al-Subha Tarikhuha wa Hukmuha
- Author died
- 1429 AH
- Editions
- Dar al-Asimah lil-Nashr wa-al-Tawzi
al-Subha: Tarikhuha wa Hukmuha (The Prayer Beads: Their History and Ruling) is a legal and historical treatise by the Saudi scholar Bakr Abu Zayd (d. 1429 AH / 2008 CE) examining the historical origins of prayer beads and the Islamic ruling on using them for counting remembrance (dhikr) .
Background and Composition
The treatise originally formed part of the author's broader work Tashih al-Du'a (Correcting Supplication), but he separated and published it as an independent book on 25 Jumada al-Ula 1419 AH (1998 CE) to maximize its benefit . It was first published by Dar al-'Asimah in 1419 AH / 1998 CE .
In the introduction, Abu Zayd notes that approximately twelve independent works had previously been written on the subject of prayer beads . He identifies al-Suyuti's al-Minha fi al-Subha as likely the first of these, followed by its abridgment al-Milha by Ibn Tulun, through to ‘Abd al-Hayy al-Laknawi's Nuzhat al-Fikr fi Subhat al-Dhikr . Abu Zayd critiques these earlier authors for exclusively defending the permissibility of prayer beads without investigating their historical origins in non-Muslim religious devotions or how they permeated into Muslim practice .
Structure and Content
The book is arranged into an introduction and two primary sections (mabhathan):
- The First Section: Details what is legislated (al-mashru'), establishing that counting numerical supplications with the fingertips is the preserved practice inherited from the Prophet ﷺ and his Companions .
- The Second Section: Analyzes what is not legislated (ghayr al-mashru'), tracing the historical shift away from the fingertips across three phases: counting with stones and date pits, counting with beads strung on a cord (al-subha), and counting using modern manufactured counter devices .
Within the second section, Abu Zayd examines the linguistic definition and etymology of al-subha, asserting that classical Arabic lexicography did not originally contain the word in this specific sense . He details its historical presence among Buddhists, Hindus, and Christian monks, and argues that it entered Islamic circles through the Shi'a (Rafida) and extreme Sufi orders . He also traces its timeline across four Islamic eras—the era of the Prophet ﷺ, the Companions, the Successors, and subsequent generations—demonstrating that reports attributing prayer beads to the Prophet's estate or narrating hadiths such as نِعْمَ المُذَكِّرُ السُّبْحَة ("What an excellent reminder the subha is") are unauthentic or fabricated .
Legal Conclusions
Abu Zayd concludes that using prayer beads as an instrument of worship is an invented religious innovation (bid'a) and an impermissible imitation (tashabbuh) of non-Muslim rituals . He further censures associated practices, such as hanging large prayer beads around the neck, attributing healing powers or spiritual connections to them, and displaying them ostentatiously, citing earlier critiques by scholars including Ibn al-Hajj in al-Madkhal . Addressing the fact that notable scholars like Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani utilized prayer beads, Abu Zayd argues that custom and habit frequently influenced scholars, but religious rulings must ultimately depend on textual proofs and sound legal principles .
Answer updated