al-Shura fi al-Sharia al-Islamiyya
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- al-Shura fi al-Sharia al-Islamiyya
al-Shura fi al-Sharia al-Islamiyya: Dirasa Muqarana bi-al-Dimuqratiyya wa-al-Nuzum al-Qanuniyya ("Consultation in Islamic Law: A Comparative Study with Democracy and Legal Systems") is a legal and political treatise by the Yemeni jurist and Supreme Court member Husayn ibn Muhammad al-Mahdi . The book examines the concept and practice of consultation (shura) in Islamic jurisprudence, comparing its principles and mechanisms to modern democratic theories, parliamentary representation, and constitutional legal systems .
Background and Publication
The work was registered at the Ministry of Culture in Yemen in 2006 CE . It includes introductory forewords by Judge Jamal Qasim al-Misbahi and the Yemeni literary scholar Dr. Abd al-Aziz al-Maqalih of Sana'a University, who noted its objective approach to framing Islamic political consultation alongside modern constitutional jurisprudence .
Structure and Contents
The treatise opens with an introduction on the significance of consultation in preventing authoritarianism and tyranny, followed by four core chapters :
- Chapter One: Provides a historical overview of consultative practices in earlier civilizations and nations, including ancient Arab, Persian, Egyptian, Indian, Roman, and Chinese traditions .
- Chapter Two: Explores the linguistic and terminological definitions of shura, the technical distinction between shura and mushawara, and the foundational evidence for its legitimacy in the Quran and the Sunnah . It also defines democracy and examines its direct and representative forms in comparative perspective .
- Chapter Three: Focuses on the application of shura in public governance across seven sections:
- Legislation: Discusses consultative lawmaking, legislative councils, parliamentary representation in relation to the classical concept of ahl al-hall wa-al-aqd ("those who loose and bind"), the non-retroactivity of laws, and judicial review of constitutionality .
- Public offices: Outlines guidelines for appointing leaders, ministers, and state officials based on competence and integrity .
- Judiciary and governance: Explores judicial consultation and compares it with jury systems in statutory legal frameworks .
- Military affairs: Examines consultative decision-making during the military expeditions of the Prophet Muhammad, such as Badr, Uhud, al-Khandaq, and al-Hudaybiyya .
- Consultative members: Identifies the criteria, qualifications, and ethical attributes required of consultative representatives .
- Historical implementation: Reviews the practical methods of consultation used during early Islamic rule and debates regarding election versus appointment .
- Binding authority: Assesses scholarly arguments regarding whether consultation is merely advisory or legally binding on the ruler, adopting the position that it is binding .
- Chapter Four: Addresses the broader societal value of consultation within the family and community, arguing for the integration of consultative ethics into modern educational curricula .
Method and Approach
The author maintains that while Islamic law establishes consultation as a mandatory governance principle, it leaves specific institutional mechanisms flexible to accommodate communal interest (maslaha) and shifting historical contexts . Drawing upon classical Sunni and Zaydi juristic sources as well as contemporary legal scholarship, the work seeks to reconcile traditional Islamic governance principles with modern constitutional mechanisms .
Answer updated