al-Shura fi al-Sharia al-Islamiyya

Author died
-
Editions
al-Shura fi al-Sharia al-Islamiyya

al-Shura fi al-Sharia al-Islamiyya: Dirasa Muqarana bi-al-Dimuqratiyya wa-al-Nuzum al-Qanuniyya ("Consultation in Islamic Law: A Comparative Study with Democracy and Legal Systems") is a legal and political treatise by the Yemeni jurist and Supreme Court member Husayn ibn Muhammad al-Mahdi . The book examines the concept and practice of consultation (shura) in Islamic jurisprudence, comparing its principles and mechanisms to modern democratic theories, parliamentary representation, and constitutional legal systems .

Background and Publication

The work was registered at the Ministry of Culture in Yemen in 2006 CE . It includes introductory forewords by Judge Jamal Qasim al-Misbahi and the Yemeni literary scholar Dr. Abd al-Aziz al-Maqalih of Sana'a University, who noted its objective approach to framing Islamic political consultation alongside modern constitutional jurisprudence .

Structure and Contents

The treatise opens with an introduction on the significance of consultation in preventing authoritarianism and tyranny, followed by four core chapters :

  • Chapter One: Provides a historical overview of consultative practices in earlier civilizations and nations, including ancient Arab, Persian, Egyptian, Indian, Roman, and Chinese traditions .
  • Chapter Two: Explores the linguistic and terminological definitions of shura, the technical distinction between shura and mushawara, and the foundational evidence for its legitimacy in the Quran and the Sunnah . It also defines democracy and examines its direct and representative forms in comparative perspective .
  • Chapter Three: Focuses on the application of shura in public governance across seven sections:
    1. Legislation: Discusses consultative lawmaking, legislative councils, parliamentary representation in relation to the classical concept of ahl al-hall wa-al-aqd ("those who loose and bind"), the non-retroactivity of laws, and judicial review of constitutionality .
    2. Public offices: Outlines guidelines for appointing leaders, ministers, and state officials based on competence and integrity .
    3. Judiciary and governance: Explores judicial consultation and compares it with jury systems in statutory legal frameworks .
    4. Military affairs: Examines consultative decision-making during the military expeditions of the Prophet Muhammad, such as Badr, Uhud, al-Khandaq, and al-Hudaybiyya .
    5. Consultative members: Identifies the criteria, qualifications, and ethical attributes required of consultative representatives .
    6. Historical implementation: Reviews the practical methods of consultation used during early Islamic rule and debates regarding election versus appointment .
    7. Binding authority: Assesses scholarly arguments regarding whether consultation is merely advisory or legally binding on the ruler, adopting the position that it is binding .
  • Chapter Four: Addresses the broader societal value of consultation within the family and community, arguing for the integration of consultative ethics into modern educational curricula .

Method and Approach

The author maintains that while Islamic law establishes consultation as a mandatory governance principle, it leaves specific institutional mechanisms flexible to accommodate communal interest (maslaha) and shifting historical contexts . Drawing upon classical Sunni and Zaydi juristic sources as well as contemporary legal scholarship, the work seeks to reconcile traditional Islamic governance principles with modern constitutional mechanisms .

Answer updated