al-Ruh - Ibn al-Qayyim

Author died
751 AH
Editions
T Ataat al-Ilm · T al-Ilmiyya

Kitab al-Ruh (The Book of the Soul) is a treatise by the Hanbali theologian and jurist Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya (691–751 AH / 1292–1350 CE) dedicated to the nature of the soul, the state of the dead, and the intermediate realm (al-barzakh) .

Composition and Structure

The book originated as a detailed response to inquiries posed to the author concerning the souls of the deceased, the intermediate state, and the reality of the spirit . It lacks a formal opening sermon (khutbah) in its original manuscript form and proceeds directly into twenty-one numbered questions (masa'il) . It is distinct from another, larger work by Ibn al-Qayyim titled Ma'rifat al-ruh wa-l-nafs, to which he explicitly refers within the fifth question of Kitab al-Ruh .

The twenty-one questions cover a progressive range of eschatological and theological issues:

  • Questions 1–3: The dead's awareness of visits and greetings from the living, the meeting of deceased souls with one another, and the meeting between souls of the living and the dead during dreams .
  • Questions 4–6: Whether spirits die alongside bodies, how souls are distinguished and recognized after leaving physical forms, and the return of the soul to the corpse in the grave .
  • Questions 7–14: The reality of the punishment and bliss of the grave ('adhab al-qabr), refuting those who deny it, the causes of this torment, means of salvation from it, and whether it is perpetual or interrupted .
  • Questions 15–16: The resting abode of souls (mustaqarr al-arwah) between death and the Resurrection, and the benefit derived by the dead from good deeds dedicated to them by the living .
  • Questions 17–18: The createdness and temporal origination (huduth) of souls, and whether spirits were created before bodies or after them .
  • Questions 19–21: The essential definition of the soul, addressing whether it is a physical entity or an immaterial abstract substance, whether the soul (nafs) and spirit (ruh) are synonymous or distinct, and whether the human soul is one entity with multiple descriptions or three distinct souls . The book concludes with subtle spiritual distinctions between commendable and blameworthy states, such as hope versus wishful thinking and dignity versus arrogance .

Method and Arguments

Ibn al-Qayyim built his exposition upon scriptural texts from the Quran and the Sunnah, statements of the Companions, rational arguments, and corroborating dream narratives (ru'a) and historical anecdotes . He explicitly cited his teacher Ibn Taymiyya across ten passages in the book, in addition to adopting several of his uncredited formulations .

On the ontology of the soul, Ibn al-Qayyim argued that the spirit is a subtle, luminous, heavenly body (jism nurani 'ulwi) that permeates the physical limbs, as opposed to the position of various philosophers and scholastic theologians who described it as an immaterial substance (jawhar mujarrad) existing neither inside nor outside the physical realm . In the nineteenth question alone, he marshaled around 115 arguments to establish its physical reality and systematically countered 22 objections raised by opposing philosophical factions .

Reception and Scholarly Influence

Kitab al-Ruh became a foundational reference for later scholars writing on eschatology and the unseen . Ibn Rajab drew extensively from it in Ahwal al-qubur, as did Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti in Sharh al-sudur, explicitly noting that he summarized most of the concluding benefits of his work from Ibn al-Qayyim's text . Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani cited it in al-Durar al-kamina and Fath al-Bari . Later scholars such as Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Saffarini lauded it as among the most comprehensive works on the topic, occasionally referring to it as al-Ruh al-kubra out of deference to its scope . Shihab al-Din Mahmud al-Alusi commended its refutation of the philosophers regarding the spirit as exhaustive .

The work was abridged and reorganized by Ibrahim ibn Umar al-Biqa'i under the title Sirr al-ruh , and summarized by Ibn Tulun as al-Futuh fi haqiqat al-ruh . A section on grave punishment was separately published in India under the title al-Risalah al-qabriyyah .

The book also drew critical remarks from several scholars. Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-San'ani criticized Ibn al-Qayyim's reliance on post-burial prompting (talqin) and argued that his refutation of the creation of souls prior to bodies was strained, though he frequently cited other portions of the treatise with approval . In modern scholarship, Nasir al-Din al-Albani expressed reservations about relying on the work due to its inclusion of problematic narrations and uncritical material, suggesting that if its attribution to Ibn al-Qayyim is genuine, it must have been an early composition written before his scholarly maturity .

Manuscripts and Publication

Around forty manuscript copies survive in libraries across the Islamic world and the West . The oldest known copy is preserved in the Zahiriyya Library in Damascus, transcribed in 774 AH, twenty-three years after the author's death .

The treatise was first printed in India in 1318 AH and reprinted there multiple times before its first Egyptian printing in 1376 AH . Its first modern critical edition, based on three manuscripts, was prepared as an academic thesis in 1404 AH and published in Riyadh in 1406 AH .

Answer updated