al-Radd ala al-Jahmiyya wa al-Zanadiqa lil-Imam Ahmad

Author died
241 AH
Editions
t Sabri

al-Radd ala al-Jahmiyya wa al-Zanadiqa (Refutation of the Jahmites and the Heretics) is a theological treatise attributed to the Hanbali jurist and traditionist Ahmad ibn Hanbal (d. 241 AH / 855 CE), written to refute early theological sects and their interpretations of ambiguous Quranic passages (mutashabihat) .

Background and Purpose

The treatise was composed in response to the theological controversies of the early third century AH surrounding the createdness of the Quran and the negation of divine attributes . It targets two primary groups: the heretics (zanadiqa), who claimed that the text of the Quran contained internal contradictions, and the followers of Jahm ibn Safwan (the Jahmiyya), who argued that God's speech and attributes were created .

The book opens with a celebrated prologue praising the scholars who remain during intervals between prophets, calling the astray back to guidance, enduring harm, and defending the Quran against the distortions of extremists, fabrications of falsifiers, and interpretations of the ignorant .

Structure and Contents

The text focuses on resolving perceived contradictions in the Quran and refuting allegorical interpretations (ta'wil) of divine attributes :

  • Refutation of the Heretics: The author addresses doubts raised concerning Quranic verses, such as the verse كُلَّمَا نَضِجَتْ جُلُودُهُمْ بَدَّلْنَاهُمْ جُلُودًا غَيْرَهَا ("Every time their skins are roasted through We will replace them with other skins"), clarifying that substitution signifies renewal rather than punishing unsinning skins .
  • Origins of Jahm's Doctrine: It recounts the debate between Jahm ibn Safwan and the empiricist Sumaniyya in Tirmidh, Khurasan, which led Jahm into doubt and prompted his formulation of doctrines negating divine attributes based on three ambiguous verses: لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ ("There is nothing like unto Him"), وَهُوَ اللَّهُ فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَفِي الْأَرْضِ ("And He is Allah in the heavens and in the earth"), and لَا تُدْرِكُهُ الْأَبْصَارُ وَهُوَ يُدْرِكُ الْأَبْصَارَ ("Vision perceives Him not, but He perceives vision") .
  • Affirmation of Divine Attributes: The work affirms traditional theological doctrines, including God speaking directly to Moses, the beatific vision of God in the Hereafter (ru'yat Allah), God being established above the Throne (istiwa'), and His distinctness from creation (ba'in min khalqihi), while rejecting the notion that God's essence is physically omnipresent (fi kulli makan) .

The methodology relies primarily on intra-Quranic exegesis (tafsir al-Qur'an bi-l-Qur'an) and linguistic analysis to dismantle speculative theological assertions .

Transmission and Authenticity

The primary transmission of the text runs through Ahmad's son Abdullah ibn Ahmad, from whom it was related by al-Khadir ibn al-Muthanna al-Kindi, and recorded by Abu Bakr al-Khallal in his Kitab al-Sunnah . Another transmission is documented through his son Salih ibn Ahmad and grandson Muhammad (Abu Ja'far), as cited by Ibn Abi Ya'la in Ibtal al-Ta'wil . The book was attributed to Ahmad ibn Hanbal by early bibliographers and historians such as Ibn al-Nadim in al-Fihrist and Ibn al-Jawzi in Manaqib al-Imam Ahmad, and was extensively cited by Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya .

Scholars have debated the book's attribution to Ahmad ibn Hanbal:

  • Al-Dhahabi expressed skepticism regarding its authenticity, citing the obscurity (jahalah) of al-Khadir ibn al-Muthanna in the primary chain of transmission, a doubt later echoed by Muhammad Zahid al-Kawthari and Wahbi Sulayman Ghawji .
  • Other scholars, such as Ibn al-Qayyim, defended its authenticity on the grounds of corroborating transmissions through Salih ibn Ahmad and its consistent reception within the early Hanbali tradition .

Answer updated