al-Qawaid al-Umm lil-Fiqh
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Dar Ibn Kathir
al-Qawaid al-Umm lil-Fiqh (The Principal Maxims of Jurisprudence) is a contemporary work on Islamic legal maxims (al-qawaid al-fiqhiyya) by the scholar Fadl Murad . The book forms part of the author's broader renewal project on contemporary jurisprudence (Fiqh al-Asr) and represents a module within his encyclopedia Maalim al-Ijtihad fi Fiqh al-Asr (Landmarks of Legal Reasoning in Contemporary Jurisprudence) .
Purpose and Scope
Murad composed the work to address what he observed as a disconnect in classical and modern treatises on legal maxims: while previous authors formulated overarching principles grounded in the Quran, Sunnah, and scholarly consensus (ijma), they traditionally confined their practical applications to the historical circumstances and subsidiary cases of early jurists . This left modern researchers theoretically connected to the maxims but detached from applying them to novel circumstances . al-Qawaid al-Umm lil-Fiqh was intended to activate agreed-upon universal maxims across all chapters of jurisprudence by using them to derive rulings for modern legal inquiries and unprecedented contemporary issues (nawazil) .
Method and Sources
To bridge theoretical legal maxims and modern applications, Murad drew upon a wide spectrum of contemporary resources . His source material includes:
- Modern compilations of unprecedented legal questions (kutub al-nawazil) and contemporary collections of legal verdicts (fatawa) .
- Formal resolutions and declarations issued by collective jurisprudence academies (al-qararat al-majmaiyya) .
- Academic university dissertations and scholarly research papers .
- Online fatwa portals and digital multimedia resources relevant to contemporary legal challenges .
Structure and Content
The work opens with an introductory chapter (al-fasl al-tamhidi) devoted to terminological definitions and legal argumentation (fi al-mahiyyat wa-l-istidlal), divided into two main discussions :
- Definitions (al-tarifat): Differentiates between three core terminologies in legal theory :
- The Legal Maxim (al-qaida al-fiqhiyya): Defined as a universal rule applying to numerous subsidiary cases across multiple legal chapters from which their individual rulings are understood (such as "hardship begets facilitation") .
- The Juristic Criterion (al-dabit al-fiqhi): A narrower rule that governs related cases within a single chapter or sub-topic (such as rules specific to collateral pledges or direct tort liability) .
- The Usul Maxim (al-qaida al-usuliyya): Methodological rules that govern how jurists deduce rulings from overarching scriptural proofs, typically focusing on linguistic indications, in contrast to legal maxims which are directly applicable universal rulings (such as "certainty is not overruled by doubt" and "matters are judged by their intentions") .
- Legal Argumentation (al-ihtijaj bi-l-qawaid): Examines the validity of employing universal legal maxims as independent proofs and refutes the transmission of views attributed to al-Juwayni, Ibn Daqiq al-Id, and Ibn Nujaym claiming that universal legal maxims cannot serve as legal evidence .
Answer updated