al-Qasida al-Ta'iyya fi al-Qadar
- Author died
- 728 AH
- Editions
- Dār Ibn Khuzaymah
al-Qasida al-Ta'iyya fi al-Qadar (The Ode Rhyming in Tāʾ on Divine Predestination) is a didactic theological poem composed by Ibn Taymiyya (d. 728 AH / 1328 CE) to defend the Islamic orthodox doctrine of divine decree and human responsibility .
Occasion and Composition
The poem was written in response to a poetic challenge presented by a non-Muslim subject (dhimmī)—variously identified as a Christian or a Jewish scholar—who questioned the justice of divine punishment for disbelief if that disbelief was already decreed by God . The questioner asked how a human could be blamed for obeying God’s universal will (mashīʾa) if God had barred the path to faith and ordained their misguidance .
Ibn Taymiyya reportedly composed his rebuttal extemporaneously (murtajilan) while seated, matching the meter and the rhyming letter (rawiyy) of the original inquiry . The opening line of his response addresses the challenger directly:
سؤالُك يا هذا سؤالُ مُعاندٍ … مُخاصمِ ربِّ العرشِ باري البريّةِ "Your question, O you, is the question of an obstinate adversary, contending with the Lord of the Throne, the Creator of creation."
Metre and Length
The ode is composed in the long poetic meter (baḥr al-ṭawīl) and rhymes throughout in the letter tāʾ . Reports vary regarding its exact line count: some sources state that it contains 124 lines, while other accounts number it at roughly 100, over 130, or more than 150 verses .
Themes and Doctrine
The central objective of the ode is to reconcile the comprehensive nature of divine decree (al-qaḍāʾ wa-l-qadar) with human accountability and moral choice . The main doctrinal arguments articulated across the poem include:
- Universality of God's Will and Creation: Ibn Taymiyya affirms God's eternal, antecedent knowledge, His overarching will (mashīʾa), and His omnipotence over all created phenomena .
- The Root of Deviation: The poem asserts that the principal source of misguidance across sects is delving into the underlying causes of God’s actions (al-khawḍ fī fiʿl al-ilāh bi-ʿilla) without comprehending His divine wisdom (ḥikma) and justice .
- Invalidity of Fatalist Justifications: Ibn Taymiyya argues that using divine predestination to excuse sin and disbelief is irrational. He compares committing disbelief to consuming poison: just as poison inevitably leads to death by God's decree without relieving the consumer of their action, sins yield punishment as their intrinsic outcome . He likewise likens invoking predestination for wicked behavior to a wolf justifying its predation by claiming it is merely its nature .
- Human Free Will and Agency: The text rejects strict fatalism (jabr), stating that human beings are not compelled without volition (laysa bi-majbūrin ʿadīmi l-irāda), but rather possess real capacity and intention created by God, by which they choose between righteousness and wrongdoing and are accordingly rewarded or punished .
Transmission and Commentaries
The poem is documented in classical biographical and collected works, including al-ʿUqūd al-Durriyya by Ibn ʿAbd al-Hādī and the eighth volume of Ibn Taymiyya's Majmūʿ al-Fatāwā .
Later scholars wrote commentaries on the poem, notably ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Saʿdī in his work al-Durra al-Bahiyya Sharḥ al-Qaṣīda al-Tāʾiyya fī Ḥall al-Mushkila al-Qadariyya (The Splendid Pearl: Commentary on the Tāʾiyya Ode on Resolving the Problem of Predestination) . The same foundational query was also answered in separate verse compositions by other scholars, such as the 167-line ode by ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn al-Ḥanafī (known as al-Jundī) and verses by Abū Saʿīd ibn Lubb .
Answer updated