al-Mufradat
- Author died
- 527 AH
- Editions
- Dar Al-Hadara
al-Mufradat (The Solitary Opinions) is a treatise on comparative Hanbali jurisprudence written by Abu al-Hasan Ibn al-Zaghuni (d. 527 AH / 1132 CE), dedicated to establishing and defending the distinct legal rulings (mufradāt) of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal and the Hanbali school .
Context and Composition
The work was written during a period of active debate over the exclusive legal positions of Ahmad ibn Hanbal . The Shafi'i jurist Ilkiya al-Harrasi (d. 504 AH) had compiled a critique attacking Ahmad's solitary opinions, prompting several contemporary Hanbali scholars—including Abu al-Wafa Ibn Aqil and Ibn al-Zaghuni—to author works on mufradāt to refute his claims, correct misattributions, and provide textual and rational proofs for the Hanbali positions .
Structure and Scope
Classical biographical works, including Ibn Rajab's Dhayl Tabaqat al-Hanabila and Ibn al-Mibrad's Mu'jam al-Kutub, record that al-Mufradat was structured across two volumes encompassing one hundred legal issues (mas'ala) . Although an alternative report claimed it contained five hundred issues, bibliographers identified one hundred as the correct figure .
The extant first part of the work contains 49 issues arranged according to standard jurisprudential chapters, beginning with ritual purity (Kitab al-Tahara) and concluding in the chapter on usurpation (Kitab al-Ghasb), with a concluding note indicating that the subsequent volume opened with the issue of sowing crops on usurped land . The second volume is missing .
Method
Ibn al-Zaghuni organizes the text by individual issues, heading each entry with the term Mas'ala . He presents the prevailing opinion of the Hanbali madhhab—frequently noting that Ahmad explicitly stated it (naṣṣa ʿalayhi Aḥmad)—and addresses divergent transmissions where applicable . He then contrasts the Hanbali position with the contrary views held by leading jurists such as Abu Hanifa and al-Shafi'i, deriving legal justifications from Quranic verses, hadith narrations, and legal analogy (qiyās) . The discussions incorporate dialectical inquiry, systematically raising potential objections and replying to them .
Attribution and Reception
Later Hanbali authorities frequently referenced the work, including Ibn Muflih in al-Furu', al-Mardawi in al-Insaf, and Mujir al-Din al-Ulaymi . A late hand on the surviving manuscript cover erroneously attributed the text to al-Qadi Abu Ya'la; however, scholars established Ibn al-Zaghuni's authorship through classical citations, the exact match of the one-hundred-issue structure, and internal cross-references to Ibn al-Zaghuni's rulings found in later legal texts . The extant portion was edited as an academic doctoral thesis at King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah .
Answer updated