al-Luma bi-Bayan anna Salat al-Eid la tujzi an Salat al-Jumua
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- al-Luma bi-Bayan anna Salat al-Eid la tujzi an Salat al-Jumua
al-Luma bi-Bayan anna Salat al-Eid la tujzi an Salat al-Jumua (Arabic: اللمعة ببيان أن صلاة العيد لا تجزئ عن صلاة الجمعة, lit. 'The Flash of Clarity Explaining That the Eid Prayer Does Not Suffice for Friday Prayer') is a short treatise by Ahmad Shehata al-Sikandari addressing the legal ruling on whether attending the Eid prayer waives the obligation of the Friday prayer (Jumua) when both fall on the same day.
Subject and Legal Argument
The treatise argues that the Friday prayer remains an individual obligation (fard) incumbent upon every adult, sane Muslim and is not dropped or replaced by performing the Eid prayer. The author emphasizes that Friday prayer is far more binding than the Eid prayer, drawing on the principle articulated by Ibn Hazm in al-Muhalla that Friday prayer is obligatory while Eid prayer is supererogatory (tatawwu), and a supererogatory act cannot waive an obligation.
To establish this obligation, al-Sikandari cites the Quranic command to attend the Friday prayer in Surah al-Jumu'ah ( يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا إِذَا نُودِيَ لِلصَّلَاةِ مِنْ يَوْمِ الْجُمُعَةِ فَاسْعَوْا إِلَى ذِكْرِ اللَّهِ وَذَرُوا الْبَيْعَ ) and prophetic warnings against neglecting it, as well as the position of Ibn Abd al-Barr in al-Tamhid, who designated the opinion dropping both Friday and Dhuhr prayers as manifestly erroneous. He adduces the authentic hadith of al-Nu'man ibn Bashir recorded in Muslim's Sahih, which demonstrates that when Eid and Friday coincided, the Prophet ﷺ led both prayers in their respective times, reciting Surah al-A'la and Surah al-Ghashiyah in both.
Criticism of Concession Hadiths
The author reviews and critiques the narrations commonly cited by proponents of a concession (rukhsa) to forgo Friday prayer after attending Eid:
- Hadith of Abu Hurayrah: Narrated through Baqiyyah ibn al-Walid from Shu'bah containing the phrase: فمن شاء أجزأه من الجمعة ("Whoever wishes, it suffices him for Friday"). al-Sikandari critiques it as defective due to transmission irregularities (idtirab), noting that authorities such as al-Daraqutni, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, and Abu Hatim al-Razi deemed it mursal through Sufyan al-Thawri and others, with the phrasing regarding sufficing (ajza'ahu) being anomalous (shadh).
- Hadith of Ibn Umar: Transmitted through Jubarah ibn al-Mughallis and Mindal ibn Ali in Sunan Ibn Majah. The author points out that both narrators are weak, with Jubarah accused of falsification by Yahya ibn Ma'in and criticized by al-Bukhari and Abu Zur'ah al-Razi; a secondary chain through Sa'id ibn Rashid al-Sammak from Ata ibn Abi Rabah is likewise judged invalid (batil).
- Hadith of Zayd ibn Arqam: Narrated through Iyas ibn Abi Ramlah al-Shami. al-Sikandari classifies it as weak due to the obscurity (jahalah) of Iyas, following Ibn al-Mundhir and Ibn Khuzaymah, as well as its conflict with the authentic report of al-Nu'man ibn Bashir. He argues that authorities like Ibn Khuzaymah, al-Tahawi, and Ibn Abd al-Barr contextualized any concession as applying solely to nomadic or outlying village dwellers (such as Ahl al-'Awali) who had entered Medina for Eid and for whom Friday prayer was not originally obligatory, as corroborated by the practice of Uthman ibn Affan.
- Hadith of Ibn Abbas: Found in Sunan Ibn Majah; al-Sikandari notes that this is an erroneous attribution for the Abu Hurayrah report via Baqiyyah, sharing the same underlying defects.
Methodological Critique
In the concluding portion of the work, al-Sikandari criticizes certain later and contemporary researchers who authenticate these weak concession reports by amalgamating their various chains (majmu' al-turuq). He argues that they overlook the contradictory implications of the narrations and their conflict with established juridical principles (al-usul). Citing the three conditions documented by al-Sakhawi from Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani for acting upon weak hadiths—that the weakness must not be severe, that the narration must fall under an established general principle, and that one must not firmly believe its attribution—the author maintains that these conditions are not met in the case of dropping the Friday prayer.
Answer updated