al-Hujja bi-Da'f Hadith man Salla Rakatayn ba'd al-Subh fa-lahu Ajr Umra wa Hajja
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- al-Hujja bi-Da'f Hadith man Salla Rakatayn ba'd al-Subh fa-lahu Ajr Umra wa Hajja
al-Hujja bi-Daʿf Hadith man Salla Rakatayn baʿd al-Subh fa-lahu Ajr ʿUmra wa Hajja (The Proof for the Weakness of the Hadith "Whoever Prays Two Rakʿahs After Dawn Receives the Reward of an ʿUmrah and a Hajj") is a specialized treatise in hadith criticism (takhrīj and ʿilal) by the contemporary scholar Abu Muhammad Ahmad Shehata al-Alfi al-Sikandari . The monograph is dedicated to evaluating and demonstrating the inauthenticity of the widely circulated hadith stating that whoever prays the morning prayer in congregation, remains seated remembering God until sunrise, and then performs two rakʿahs receives the complete reward of a Hajj and an ʿUmrah .
Methodological Premise
The author opens the work by highlighting the consensus among traditional hadith scholars on avoiding spurious narrations and strange, uncorroborated reports (al-gharāʾib wa al-manākīr) . Drawing from al-Khatib al-Baghdadi's al-Jāmiʿ li-Akhlāq al-Rāwī, he cites early authorities—including Abu Hanifa, Abdullah ibn al-Mubarak, Ibrahim ibn Adham, and Malik ibn Anas—who warned against pursuing odd transmission paths and prioritized well-attested reports . Al-Sikandari designates this critical principle as the foundation for examining the defects (nakārah) of the hadith under investigation .
Critical Analysis of Transmission Routes
The core of the treatise systematically analyzes the various chains of transmission (ṭuruq) attributed to several Companions:
- Narrations of Anas ibn Malik: The author reviews the primary version transmitted through Abu Dhilal Hilal al-Qasmali in al-Tirmidhi's Sunan and al-Baghawi's Sharh al-Sunnah . While al-Tirmidhi termed it ḥasan gharīb citing al-Bukhari's comment that Abu Dhilal was "fair in hadith" (muqārib al-ḥadīth), al-Sikandari demonstrates that Abu Dhilal was widely declared weak and known for transmitting rejected reports by Yahya ibn Ma'in, Abu Dawud, Ibn Hibban, and al-Nasa'i, and that al-Bukhari himself elsewhere noted his transmission of manākīr . Two other routes attributed to Anas—via Thawaba ibn Mas'ud and via Thabit al-Bunani with an isnād containing Dirar ibn 'Amr and Bakr ibn Khunays—are analyzed and dismissed as severely flawed, broken (muʿḍal), or near-fabricated .
- Narrations of Abu Umamah al-Bahili and ʿUtbah ibn ʿAbd: The author assesses the narration in al-Tabarani's al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr through Uthman ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Tara'ifi, judging it munkar due to al-Tara'ifi’s known transmission from obscure individuals and his divergence from established authorities (such as Isma'il ibn 'Ayyash and al-Walid ibn Muslim), who instead transmitted the well-preserved wording regarding walking to the obligatory prayer and the ḍuḥā prayer . A second transmission via al-Ahwas ibn Hakim is identified as erratic and disordered (muḍṭarib), given al-Ahwas's poor memory and frequent shifting of isnāds .
- Narrations of Abdullah ibn Umar: Examining the chain recorded by al-Tabarani through al-Fadl ibn Muwaffaq from Malik ibn Mighwal from Nafi', al-Sikandari notes that al-Fadl was deemed weak and known for transmitting fabricated material according to Abu Hatim al-Razi, alongside further defects involving Abu Mu'awiya al-Darir when narrating outside the transmission of al-A'mash .
- Narrations of Aisha: The route recorded in Ibn Adi's al-Kāmil fī Duʿafāʾ al-Rijāl through Abu Hudhayfah Ishaq ibn Bishr al-Bukhari is classified as fabricated (mawḍūʿ) due to Abu Hudhayfah’s status as an established fabricator . Evaluating another route via 'Amra from 'Aisha, the author corrects later scholars who conflated the narrator with 'Amra bint Abd al-Rahman, clarifying that she was 'Amra bint Arta'ah al-'Adawiyyah al-Basriyyah, and enumerates seven different female narrators named 'Amra who transmitted from 'Aisha .
Answer updated