al-Fajr Fajran
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- al-Fajr Fajran
al-Fajr Fajran (The Dawn Is Two Dawns) is a short legal treatise written by Adnan al-Arur, clarifying the theological and jurisprudential distinctions between the false dawn and the true dawn and their respective rulings regarding fasting and prayer.
Purpose and Celestial Distinctions
The author authored the work—introduced under the subtitle Bid'at al-imsak qabla al-fajr wa-hurmat al-akl wa-l-shurb ba'dah ("The Innovation of Withholding Before Dawn, and the Prohibition of Eating and Drinking After It")—to address two opposing practices observed among fasting Muslims: individuals continuing to eat and drink after the true dawn has appeared, and others coercing people to cease eating well before true dawn under the claim of pious precaution (ihtiyat). Grounding the discussion in the Quranic verse وَكُلُوا وَاشْرَبُوا حَتَّىٰ يَتَبَيَّنَ لَكُمُ الْخَيْطُ الْأَبْيَضُ مِنَ الْخَيْطِ الْأَسْوَدِ مِنَ الْفَجْرِ ("And eat and drink until the white thread becomes distinct to you from the black thread of the dawn", al-Baqarah: 187) and prophetic hadiths, the treatise describes the physical manifestations of the two dawns:
- The False Dawn (al-fajr al-kadhib): Appears first, rising vertically into the sky like the tail of a wolf (dhanab al-sirhan), narrow at the base and broad above. It does not permit the morning prayer nor prohibit food for the fasting person.
- The True Dawn (al-fajr al-sadiq): Rises after the false dawn horizontally along the horizon, emerging between 1 and 25 minutes later depending on the season (or approximately 20 minutes later), marking the prohibition of eating for fasting and the valid entry of the dawn prayer time.
Legal Issues and Arguments
The treatise outlines four primary legal issues (masa'il):
- The Two Calls to Prayer and Exceptions for Food: The treatise explains that two adhans are legislated for dawn. The first is an advisory call (tanbihi) at the false dawn to alert those eating the pre-dawn meal (suhur) and awaken worshippers, containing the call al-salatu khayrun min al-nawm ("prayer is better than sleep"); the author notes that some countries erroneously title this call adhan al-imsak and force people to stop eating. The second call is for the true dawn. The author notes that the prophetic dispensation إِذَا سَمِعَ أَحَدُكُمُ النِّدَاءَ، وَالإِنَاءُ عَلَى يَدِهِ، فَلَا يَضَعْهُ، حَتَّى يَقْضِيَ حَاجَتَهُ مِنْهُ ("If one of you hears the call while the vessel is in his hand, let him not put it down until he fulfills his need from it") applies specifically to the second adhan when a person is already in the act of consuming food, rather than serving as a blanket license to start drinking after the dawn call.
- Critique of Narrations on Eating After Dawn: Al-Arur critiques reports cited by some scholars permitting food after dawn, including a narration recorded in Tafsir al-Tabari concerning Umar ibn al-Khattab drinking when the prayer was established (uqimat al-salah). He states that if authentic, iqama here signifies the adhan, or the report is defective due to sole transmission by Husayn ibn Waqid; he also challenges the view expressed by Ali al-Halabi and Salim al-Hilali in their book Sifat Sawm al-Nabi regarding the chains of that report.
- Withholding Before True Dawn: The work characterizes obligatory abstention (imsak) prior to the true dawn as religious extremism (ghuluw) and an unwarranted prohibition of what God permitted, citing traditions commanding the hastening of breaking the fast and delaying of suhur.
- Timing Regulations for Muezzins and Calendars: The treatise emphasizes the prohibition on muezzins calling the adhan early or late, warning that praying before the valid time renders the prayer void. If a muezzin or prayer calendar (taqwim) is inaccurate, Muslims are obligated to rely on the actual celestial time established by Islamic law rather than the faulty call or calendar.
Answer updated