Ahkam Ruyat al-Hilal
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Ahkam Ruyat al-Hilal
Ahkam Ruyat al-Hilal (Rulings on Sighting the Crescent Moon) is a concise legal treatise by the contemporary scholar Adnan al-Arur that addresses the jurisprudential and practical questions surrounding the determination of Islamic lunar months for fasting and Eid.
Background and Purpose
The work was composed as an epistolary response to recurring inquiries sent to the author from Muslims residing in various countries, especially those living in Western nations. Al-Arur noted that perennial disputes, sectarian rigidities, and disagreements over the start and end of Ramadan had caused widespread division among Muslim communities. In response, he formulated a concise set of universal principles aimed at regulating the issue without adherence to narrow regionalism or partisan affiliations.
Structure and Key Rulings
The treatise is structured around fourteen concise points and principles outlining the legal rules and practical scenarios related to the crescent moon:
- Primacy of visual sighting: The default method for establishing the start and end of lunar months is naked-eye visual sighting (الرؤية البصرية), in accordance with the prophetic command صوموا لرؤيته وأفطروا لرؤيته ("Fast upon seeing it and break your fast upon seeing it"). The author cautions against overburdening religious obligations through rigid dependence on observatories, satellites, or intricate mathematical computations.
- Global unity of fasting: Fasting and the celebration of Eid ought ideally to be unified for the entire Muslim community across all regions, arguing that the moon, the earth, and the Muslim community are single entities unaffected by political borders.
- Critique of differing moon-risings (ikhtilaf al-matali'): The author rejects the notion that modern nation-state borders represent distinct astronomical moon-risings. He maintains that while the crescent progressively appears from east to west along longitudinal lines, dividing religious rulings according to political frontiers is unfounded in both Islamic law and astronomical reality. He interprets the historical report of Kurayb from Abdullah ibn Abbas as reflecting the practical impossibility of rapid communication in early times rather than an endorsement of political boundaries.
- Preserving communal unity: In the event of local or national disagreement, an individual Muslim should fast and celebrate Eid in accordance with the Muslim community or authority of the country where they reside, prioritizing communal unity over individual differing views. In non-Muslim Western countries where Muslims disagree, one should follow their local neighborhood or mosque congregation.
- Role of astronomical calculations: Calculations fall within legitimate scholarly difference only when used in a corroborative capacity—analogous to supporting testimony that does not nullify verified visual sightings. Treating mathematical calculations as an absolute authority that overrides actual visual observation is deemed impermissible.
- Authority and public order: Declaring the entry of the month is the responsibility of rulers and decision-makers (أولو الأمر), while common Muslims are commanded to follow the community to prevent chaos and discord.
- Post-commencement doubts: Speculation regarding the size or thickness of the crescent after fasting has already commenced is disregarded, relying on the narration of Abu al-Bakhtari with Ibn Abbas.
- Travelers and Day of Arafah: Travelers must follow the timing of the country they enter, making up any deficit if their total fast falls short of twenty-nine days, and fasting optionally if it exceeds thirty days. Additionally, the author asserts that Muslims worldwide must follow the pilgrims in Mecca for the determination of the Day of Arafah and Eid al-Adha.
- Muslim minorities: Muslims living in non-Muslim lands or under regimes that disregard Islamic law are advised to commence fasting upon the first verified sighting announced anywhere in the Muslim world.
Answer updated