Ahkam al-Lams fi al-Tahara
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Islamic University
Ahkam al-Lams fi al-Tahara (Rulings of Touch in Ritual Purity) is a specialized treatise on Islamic jurisprudence by Abdullah al-Suhaili, examining the legal rulings regarding physical contact and whether it nullifies ritual purity (tahara) .
Purpose and Scope
Al-Suhaili authored the work as an independent legal study dedicated to resolving jurisprudential ambiguities surrounding physical contact (al-lams and al-mass), delineating which forms of touch invalidate ritual purity—thereby rendering acts of worship invalid—and which do not .
Structure and Content
The treatise is organized into an introduction, a preliminary chapter (tamhid), three main chapters, and a conclusion :
- Preliminary Chapter (al-Tamhid): Explores the lexical and jurisprudential definitions of lams, the subtle distinctions between lams and mass, and their varied contextual usages in the Quran and the Sunnah .
- Chapter One: Addresses touching the private parts (al-awrah), divided into three sub-sections: touching the genitals (by a man himself, touching another's privates, or by a woman herself); touching non-genital parts of the awrah (the anus, testicles, buttocks, pubic area, or an animal's privates); and the modalities of touch (using the inner palm versus the back of the hand, intentional versus unintentional contact, and touching through a barrier) .
- Chapter Two: Examines touching non-awrah regions of the body across two sub-sections: interpersonal contact (between men and women, touching a beardless youth, touch between two men, and touch between two women); and touching unmarriageable relatives (mahram), young children, bodily attachments (hair, nails, and teeth), as well as the ruling on whether the person being touched loses ritual purity .
- Chapter Three: Covers touching a deceased person (during washing, carrying, or otherwise) and handling the Mus-haf (direct touch with bare hands versus carrying it without direct skin contact) .
- Conclusion (al-Khatima): Summarizes the primary findings and legal determinations reached in the treatise .
Method and Sources
Al-Suhaili adopted a comparative jurisprudential method (fiqh muqaran), presenting the positions of the four Sunni schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali), alongside statements from the Companions of the Prophet, the Successors, other early jurists, and the Zahiri school, maintaining chronological progression among scholars .
For each issue, he begins with scholarly consensus (ijma) where established, or with the majority opinion where disagreement is minor, followed by divergent viewpoints, evidence, counter-arguments, and a concluding evaluation of the preponderant opinion (al-qawl al-rajih) . The author cites juristic positions directly from primary source texts, verifies hadith narrations by citing canonical collections and noting their authenticity ratings, defines obscure vocabulary, and appends an alphabetical index of sources and subjects .
Answer updated