Afat al-Lisan
- Author died
- -
- Editions
- Afat al-Lisan
Afat al-Lisan (Arabic: آفات اللسان, lit. 'Afflictions of the Tongue') is a concise contemporary treatise by Abu Faysal al-Badrani on Islamic ethics and verbal sins, outlining the moral and legal rulings associated with speech and silence.
Composition and Method
The treatise was originally compiled by the author as personal summary notes on verbal afflictions. When the material accumulated, he arranged and published it to provide general benefit. The work is derived from an inductive reading of the Quran and the Sunnah, structured in concise bullet points stripped of extensive evidential chains and textual proofs to preserve brevity. In a concluding note, the author noted that the source citations were not documented with detailed attribution due to the text's origins as a personal summary.
Content and Structure
The book frames verbal transgressions around two fundamental hazards: speaking falsehood and remaining silent when truth is required. It opens with a broad inventory of prohibited speech, including swearing by other than God, excessive praise, reviling time or illness, hurtful nicknames, affected speech, wishing for death, and excessive chatter. It then examines specific verbal and auditory offenses in distinct thematic sections:
- Backbiting (al-Ghibah): Defines backbiting as mentioning an identifiable person in a manner they dislike, whether through spoken words, gestures, or writing. It details exceptions where backbiting is legally permissible or required, such as seeking justice before a ruler or judge, warning Muslims about untrustworthy narrators or corrupt teachers, changing wrongdoing, and seeking legal rulings. It also discusses the spiritual remedies for backbiting, the prohibition of listening to it, and practical guidance on handling family gatherings where slander occurs.
- False Accusation (al-Qadhf): Classifies defamation of unchastity into explicit, implicit, and insinuating statements. It notes that poetic confessions to offenses requiring prescribed punishments (hudud) do not trigger statutory penalties because poets customarily exaggerate or invent occurrences, citing reports involving the caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab and the poet al-Farazdaq.
- Calumny (al-Namimah): Explains the transmission of reports aimed at sowing discord, distinguishing it from constructive communication intended for reconciliation or sincere counsel.
- Listening (al-Sama'): Distinguishes unintentional hearing from deliberate listening, and lays out rules regarding eavesdropping, spying, hearing musical instruments, and religious vocal chants (anashid).
- Cursing (al-La'n): Analyzes general versus specific cursing of sinners and disbelievers.
- Falsehood (al-Kadhib): Defines lying, false testimony, and double-meaning equivocation (tawriyah and ma'arid). It outlines scenarios where misleading speech or lying is prohibited, permissible, or obligatory (such as saving an innocent person from harm, warfare, and spousal reconciliation), as well as educational storytelling.
- Debate and Disputation (al-Mujadalah wa-al-Munazarah): Differentiates constructive argumentation aimed at clarifying truth from blameworthy disputation, and outlines the parameters for debating innovators.
- Poetry (al-Shi'r): Explores praiseworthy poetry in defense of truth alongside illicit verse, such as explicit erotic poetry or verses containing theological violations. It also clarifies the permissibility of transmitting pre-Islamic narratives and poetry for linguistic illustration or warning.
Answer updated