Ada ma wajab min bayan wad al-waddaain fi Rajab

Author died
633 AH
Editions
Al-Maktab al-Islāmī

Ada ma wajab min bayan wad al-waddaain fi Rajab (Fulfilling What Is Obligatory in Explaining the Fabrications of Fabricators Regarding Rajab) is a specialized hadith treatise by the Andalusian scholar Abu al-Khattab Umar ibn Hasan ibn Dihya al-Kalbi (d. 633 AH / 1235 CE) dedicated to identifying and refuting fabricated narrations and ritual innovations associated with the Islamic month of Rajab .

Background and Core Themes

The treatise addresses religious practices that emerged around the veneration of Rajab, which the author evaluates as innovated customs lacking authentic scriptural foundation . Key topics treated in the work include:

  • Fasting throughout Rajab: Ibn Dihya argues against singling out the entirety of Rajab for fasting or joining it continuously to Sha'ban and Ramadan . Citing Abu Ismail Abd Allah al-Ansari through the hadith transmitter al-Mu'taman ibn Ahmad al-Saji, he emphasizes that nothing authentic has reached posterity regarding the special virtues of Rajab or fasting specifically within it . He also adduces reports through Sa'id ibn Mansur and al-Fakihi showing that early figures, including Umar ibn al-Khattab and Abu Bakr, disapproved of treating Rajab like Ramadan and discouraged its continuous fasting because it was a month venerated in pre-Islamic times (al-Jahiliyyah) .
  • The Prayer of Ragha'ib (Salat al-Ragha'ib): The book condemns the ritual prayer performed on the first Friday night of Rajab as an invented practice based on fabricated hadiths . Ibn Dihya names Ali ibn Abd Allah ibn Jahdam as the transmitter suspected of forging its narration using unknown chains of transmission .
  • The Date of the Prophet's Night Journey (al-Isra'): Ibn Dihya critiques popular storytellers (al-qussas) who claimed that the Night Journey occurred on the twenty-seventh of Rajab, describing this claim as false according to hadith critics . He cites Abu Ishaq al-Harbi, who placed the event on the twenty-seventh of Rabi' al-Awwal, and references his own separate composition, al-Ibtihaj fi ahadith al-mi'raj, for further examination of the conflicting reports .

Critical Hadith Analysis

Throughout the text, Ibn Dihya evaluates the chains of transmission and narrators of popular reports concerning Rajab . He critiques narrators known among traditional critics for forgery or severe weakness, including:

  • Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn al-Hasan al-Naqqash: Ibn Dihya rejects the lengthy hadith narrated by al-Naqqash containing exorbitant promises of reward for fasting in Rajab, quoting criticisms of al-Naqqash from al-Khatib al-Baghdadi, Talhah ibn Ja'far, and Abu Bakr al-Barqani .
  • Musa al-Tawil: He declares the narration about a river in Paradise called Rajab to be fabricated, noting Ibn Hibban's classification of Musa al-Tawil as a fabricator of reports attributed to Anas ibn Malik .
  • Ma'mun ibn Ahmad and Ahmad ibn Abd Allah al-Juwaybari: He rejects prayers linked to the beginning, middle, or specific days of Rajab narrated through these figures .

Reception and Publication

The work was transmitted and cited by later scholars studying religious innovations and hadith criticism. Abu Shamah al-Maqdisi cited extensive excerpts from the text in his treatise al-Ba'ith 'ala inkar al-bida' wa-al-hawadith, including Ibn Dihya's discussions on fasting, fabricated prayers, and narrative claims about the month .

The text was edited by Muhammad Zuhayr al-Shawish, accompanied by hadith authentication (takhrij) by Muhammad Nasir al-Din al-Albani, and published in a single volume by al-Maktab al-Islami in 1419 AH (1998 CE) .

Answer updated